On Nov 16 2016 9:11 AM, Chris Radek wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 08:15:42AM -0600, dragon wrote:
>> Below is a link to an email thread where Ben Potter submitted a
>> patch
>> set to implement g71 into the interpreter in 2012. It was never
>> accepted.
>>
>>
>> https://sourceforge.net/p/emc/
On Wednesday 16 November 2016 11:39:41 andy pugh wrote:
> On 16 November 2016 at 16:28, Gene Heskett
wrote:
> > It would to me also. But I was following the tut of someone else
> > that did essentially what I did, for the same machine.
>
> It wasn't me, was it?
>
> https://get.google.com/albumar
On 16 November 2016 at 16:28, Gene Heskett wrote:
> It would to me also. But I was following the tut of someone else that did
> essentially what I did, for the same machine.
It wasn't me, was it?
https://get.google.com/albumarchive/108164504656404380542/album/AF1QipPOz00WSO-6uwm4m9ldtozANpzq9ArC
On Wednesday 16 November 2016 11:06:55 andy pugh wrote:
> On 16 November 2016 at 15:56, Gene Heskett
wrote:
> > The small bit of postings about G71 possibly being added to
> > LinuxCNC, prompts me to ask about the chances of G68/G69 being added
> > as I have needed to be able to do that on a few
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 08:15:42AM -0600, dragon wrote:
> Below is a link to an email thread where Ben Potter submitted a patch
> set to implement g71 into the interpreter in 2012. It was never accepted.
>
> https://sourceforge.net/p/emc/mailman/emc-users/thread/000601cd831d%24bc81b600%2435852200%
On 16 November 2016 at 15:56, Gene Heskett wrote:
> The small bit of postings about G71 possibly being added to LinuxCNC,
> prompts me to ask about the chances of G68/G69 being added as I have
> needed to be able to do that on a few projects. Making tapered gibs for
> instance, is now a matter of
Greetings all;
The small bit of postings about G71 possibly being added to LinuxCNC,
prompts me to ask about the chances of G68/G69 being added as I have
needed to be able to do that on a few projects. Making tapered gibs for
instance, is now a matter of proping up one end of a bit of material,
On 16 November 2016 at 14:40, John Thornton wrote:
> If your needing testers I can attempt to test this on my Hardinge CHNC.
> All I have to do is to remember to download it in the morning during
> free time...
One thing I think I spotted looking at it in a Sim is that the X
retract prior to the
If your needing testers I can attempt to test this on my Hardinge CHNC.
All I have to do is to remember to download it in the morning during
free time...
JT
On 11/16/2016 8:15 AM, dragon wrote:
> Below is a link to an email thread where Ben Potter submitted a patch
> set to implement g71 into t
Below is a link to an email thread where Ben Potter submitted a patch
set to implement g71 into the interpreter in 2012. It was never accepted.
https://sourceforge.net/p/emc/mailman/emc-users/thread/000601cd831d%24bc81b600%2435852200%24%40org/#msg29723177
Andy Pugh has updated the patch set to ap
On 11/16/2016 6:54 AM, Jeff Epler wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 06:13:35AM -0600, Jim Craig wrote:
>> If I develop this application around the python-pygoocanvas package can
>> we modify the standard linuxcnc distribution to include this package by
>> default? If so I will continue and modify th
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 06:13:35AM -0600, Jim Craig wrote:
> If I develop this application around the python-pygoocanvas package can
> we modify the standard linuxcnc distribution to include this package by
> default? If so I will continue and modify the code to use this new
> canvas for the dra
Hello all,
I have been working on this project slowly. I am still working based on
the crapahalic program however it is becoming less and less of what I am
using at the time being. My latest setback is when scaling the
gnomecanvas so that the display has a zoom capability everything scales
exc
13 matches
Mail list logo
