[Emc-developers] changes in tooltable?

2020-04-12 Thread Reinhard
Hi, I recently discovered, that tooltable in nml-status does not contain the right values from tool.tbl file. When I open axis to edit tooltable, the values are shown. Same is true, when I read the tool.tbl file with my app. But when I read tool-table from nml-status, than there are no Z-values.

Re: [Emc-developers] Toolchange and tlo behaviour change in 2.8

2020-04-12 Thread Reinhard
Hi, On Freitag, 10. April 2020, 13:25:04 CEST andy pugh wrote: > LinuxCNC offers G43.1 to apply a temporary tool offset. I tried it, and it works as documented. How can I change this way (temporary) the diameter of a tool? Reinhard ___ Emc-develope

Re: [Emc-developers] Toolchange and tlo behaviour change in 2.8

2020-04-12 Thread andy pugh
On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 at 15:46, Reinhard wrote: > How can I change this way (temporary) the diameter of a tool? Assuming that this is for cutter compensation purposes, G41.1 and G42.1 -- atp "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is designed for the especial use of mechanic

Re: [Emc-developers] changes in tooltable?

2020-04-12 Thread andy pugh
On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 at 14:27, Reinhard wrote: > Have there been changes, that I missed? There was a change to increase the tool limit. https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/search?o=desc&q=tool&s=committer-date&type=Commits Though that should't have broken it. -- atp "A motorcycle is a bicycle

Re: [Emc-developers] changes in tooltable?

2020-04-12 Thread Reinhard
Hi Andy, On Montag, 13. April 2020, 00:32:55 CEST andy pugh wrote: > Though that should't have broken it. May be not broken, but at least weird. Size of tooltable in nml-status is now 1001 (sounds like myths of Scheherazade :) ), but every tool has coordinate-values 0 (at least z-axis is 0), dia

Re: [Emc-developers] Toolchange and tlo behaviour change in 2.8

2020-04-12 Thread Reinhard
Hi, I'm confused. Seriously :( > On Freitag, 10. April 2020, 13:25:04 CEST andy pugh wrote: > > LinuxCNC offers G43.1 to apply a temporary tool offset. > > I tried it, and it works as documented. Not sure any more. I understood documentation that way, that G43.1 adds an offset to existing tool

[Emc-developers] temporary tool offset?

2020-04-12 Thread Reinhard
Hi, I'm quite disappointed about the behaviour of G43.1 and after reading G41.1 and G42.1 they look to behave as well that way. I can't imagine a usecase, where I want to replace any tooloffset value from gcode. Please help. The only usecases, that are quite common are the relative change of