On Wednesday 16 November 2016 11:39:41 andy pugh wrote:
> On 16 November 2016 at 16:28, Gene Heskett
wrote:
> > It would to me also. But I was following the tut of someone else
> > that did essentially what I did, for the same machine.
>
> It wasn't me, was it?
>
> https://get.google.com/albumar
On 16 November 2016 at 16:28, Gene Heskett wrote:
> It would to me also. But I was following the tut of someone else that did
> essentially what I did, for the same machine.
It wasn't me, was it?
https://get.google.com/albumarchive/108164504656404380542/album/AF1QipPOz00WSO-6uwm4m9ldtozANpzq9ArC
On Wednesday 16 November 2016 11:06:55 andy pugh wrote:
> On 16 November 2016 at 15:56, Gene Heskett
wrote:
> > The small bit of postings about G71 possibly being added to
> > LinuxCNC, prompts me to ask about the chances of G68/G69 being added
> > as I have needed to be able to do that on a few
On 16 November 2016 at 15:56, Gene Heskett wrote:
> The small bit of postings about G71 possibly being added to LinuxCNC,
> prompts me to ask about the chances of G68/G69 being added as I have
> needed to be able to do that on a few projects. Making tapered gibs for
> instance, is now a matter of
Greetings all;
The small bit of postings about G71 possibly being added to LinuxCNC,
prompts me to ask about the chances of G68/G69 being added as I have
needed to be able to do that on a few projects. Making tapered gibs for
instance, is now a matter of proping up one end of a bit of material,
