On 03/25/2014 11:34 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Humm, maybe I'll have to look at it again. The last time I
> used it, on my laptop while I was in the UP, I found that
> while it worked well, it was very hard to configure. I
> wasn't aware they had commandeered the RMB to do much of
> that. If it
On Mar 25 2014 10:34 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 March 2014 00:24:09 Jon Elson did opine:
>
>> On 03/25/2014 09:02 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> > I have 12.04 LTS on another drive, but I haven't yet
>> > managed to make an email agent work. They have done
>> > something to kmail that ca
On Wednesday 26 March 2014 00:24:09 Jon Elson did opine:
> On 03/25/2014 09:02 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > I have 12.04 LTS on another drive, but I haven't yet
> > managed to make an email agent work. They have done
> > something to kmail that causes an instant crash/segfault,
>
> Well, I use Thu
On 03/25/2014 09:02 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> I have 12.04 LTS on another drive, but I haven't yet
> managed to make an email agent work. They have done
> something to kmail that causes an instant crash/segfault,
Well, I use Thunderbird, and it works fine. Over the years
I've learned enough abou
tp://static.mah.priv.at/public/rt-preempt/README
>>>> That's cool, but it's instructions for a different realtime kernel
>>>> than what Gene was asking about.
>>> That is a comparatively minor detail. I am not married to 3.3.6.
>>>
>>&
On Tuesday 25 March 2014 21:46:55 Jon Elson did opine:
> On 03/25/2014 02:54 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> > Ubuntu Precise 12.04 and Debian Wheezy 7.4, with RTAI on Linux 3.4.
>
> I can't say about the RT-related issues with Ubuntu 12.04,
> but for
> general use, it works VERY well. I ran in
On 03/25/2014 02:54 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
>
> Ubuntu Precise 12.04 and Debian Wheezy 7.4, with RTAI on Linux 3.4.
>
>
I can't say about the RT-related issues with Ubuntu 12.04,
but for
general use, it works VERY well. I ran into a lot of
X-related problems
with 10.04, such as odd LCD sc
about.
> >
> > That is a comparatively minor detail. I am not married to 3.3.6.
> >
> >>> -Original Message-
> >>> From: Gene Heskett [mailto:ghesk...@wdtv.com]
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 3:56 PM
> >>> T
> That's cool, but it's instructions for a different realtime kernel than
>> what Gene was asking about.
>>
> That is a comparatively minor detail. I am not married to 3.3.6.
>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Gene Heskett [mailto:ghesk...@wdtv.c
to 3.3.6.
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Gene Heskett [mailto:ghesk...@wdtv.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 3:56 PM
> > To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Question on 14.04 LTS
> >
> > On Tuesday 25 Marc
On 3/25/14 14:33 , Matt Westveld wrote:
> My bad!
>
> So, Xenomai, RT-preempt and RTAI are three distinct real-time kernels?
> (or patch-sets?)
Yes, they're different realtime kernels.
LinuxCNC currently only supports RTAI.
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
--
My bad!
So, Xenomai, RT-preempt and RTAI are three distinct real-time kernels?
(or patch-sets?)
-Original Message-
From: Sebastian Kuzminsky [mailto:s...@highlab.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 4:19 PM
To: EMC developers
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Question on 14.04 LTS
On 3/25
#x27;s cool, but it's instructions for a different realtime kernel than
what Gene was asking about.
> -Original Message-
> From: Gene Heskett [mailto:ghesk...@wdtv.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 3:56 PM
> To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [E
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 3:56 PM
To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Question on 14.04 LTS
On Tuesday 25 March 2014 15:53:22 Peter C. Wallace did opine:
> On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 12:38:38 -0600
>
On 3/25/14 13:59 , Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 March 2014 15:58:40 Sebastian Kuzminsky did opine:
>
>> On 3/25/14 13:52 , Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 25 March 2014 15:50:47 Sebastian Kuzminsky did opine:
On 3/25/14 12:28 , Gene Heskett wrote:
> Is there any progress on build
On Tuesday 25 March 2014 15:58:40 Sebastian Kuzminsky did opine:
> On 3/25/14 13:52 , Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Tuesday 25 March 2014 15:50:47 Sebastian Kuzminsky did opine:
> >> On 3/25/14 12:28 , Gene Heskett wrote:
> >>> Is there any progress on building an rtai version of the kernel
> >>> lik
On Tuesday 25 March 2014 15:53:22 Peter C. Wallace did opine:
> On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 12:38:38 -0600
> > From: Sebastian Kuzminsky
> > Reply-To: EMC developers
> > To: EMC developers
> > Subject: Re: [Emc-
On 3/25/14 13:52 , Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 March 2014 15:50:47 Sebastian Kuzminsky did opine:
>
>> On 3/25/14 12:28 , Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> Is there any progress on building an rtai version of the kernel likely
>>> to ship with 14.04 LTS final?
>>>
>>> Any estimates of target date?
>>
On Tuesday 25 March 2014 15:50:47 Sebastian Kuzminsky did opine:
> On 3/25/14 12:28 , Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Is there any progress on building an rtai version of the kernel likely
> > to ship with 14.04 LTS final?
> >
> > Any estimates of target date?
>
> No one is working on this as far as i k
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 12:38:38 -0600
> From: Sebastian Kuzminsky
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Question on 14.04 LTS
>
> On 3/25/14 12:28 , Gene Heskett wrote:
>&g
On 3/25/14 12:28 , Gene Heskett wrote:
> Is there any progress on building an rtai version of the kernel likely to
> ship with 14.04 LTS final?
>
> Any estimates of target date?
No one is working on this as far as i know.
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
-
Is there any progress on building an rtai version of the kernel likely to
ship with 14.04 LTS final?
Any estimates of target date?
Cheers, Gene
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web
22 matches
Mail list logo
