Re: [Emc-developers] Questions Re: The Jerk Limitation Problem in LinuxCNC

2012-05-01 Thread Joachim Franek
On Tuesday 01 May 2012 21:04:47 andy pugh wrote: > On 1 May 2012 19:24, Kenneth Lerman wrote: > > > 2 -- If I were to build a function (or package of functions) to solve > > the problem, what would its interface look like? > > I would have imagined an [AXIS_N] MAX_JERK entry in the INI file. I

Re: [Emc-developers] Questions Re: The Jerk Limitation Problem in LinuxCNC

2012-05-01 Thread Joachim Franek
My first contribution is the summary, I just wrote. From this summary the recommandation follows: invest your working time in a solution with sinusoidal time function (or something similar). BTW: do you know another approximation function to gaussian with limited time unequal zero? My second cont

Re: [Emc-developers] Questions Re: The Jerk Limitation Problem in LinuxCNC

2012-05-01 Thread andy pugh
On 1 May 2012 19:24, Kenneth Lerman wrote: > 2 -- If I were to build a function (or package of functions) to solve > the problem, what would its interface look like? I would have imagined an [AXIS_N] MAX_JERK entry in the INI file. Is there any reason that it wouldn't be that simple? -- atp Th

[Emc-developers] Questions Re: The Jerk Limitation Problem in LinuxCNC

2012-05-01 Thread Kenneth Lerman
Hello all, There have been a large number of emails flying around concerning this subject. In order to understand where this fits into LinuxCNC, I would like to understand some things: 1 -- Where does this fit into the current (or future) design of LinuxCNC? 2 -- If I were to build a function