On 10/17/2012 2:44 PM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> On that note, I think it might also be good to be able to separate out
> building the GUI applications from the guts of LinuxCNC.
As long as we're on the subject of non-guts stuff it would be nice for
the build-documentation process to be separa
Am 18.10.2012 um 17:49 schrieb Sebastian Kuzminsky:
...thanks, got that - runtests, sure, didnt think of that
>
>
>> If it is OK to assume that the build target kernel is *installed* but *not
>> running* and support files in place, then I would go a different route:
>>
>> do the build by spe
On 10/18/12 09:33 , Michael Haberler wrote:
> a question about the buildbot: does the build VM actually run the RTAI
> kernel? or does it just carry the RTAI files so it can build?
There are currently about a dozen buildslave VMs in the buildbot. Some
of them run the regular Ubuntu kernel for th
[really a question to Seb, but touching wider config issues]
a question about the buildbot: does the build VM actually run the RTAI kernel?
or does it just carry the RTAI files so it can build?
the issue behind the question is:
the current src/configure
--with-realtime= option is really odd,
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Charles Steinkuehler <
char...@steinkuehler.net> wrote:
>
> On that note, I think it might also be good to be able to separate out
> building the GUI applications from the guts of LinuxCNC.
> --snip-- Seems like I should be able to build & use LinuxCNC even if
On 10/16/2012 6:00 PM, Michael Haberler wrote:
> I believe we should think about the future of LinuxCNC under the
> assumption of a potentially distributed setup - an 'RT outboard',
> 'CNC controller', whatever, and some other machine running UI and
> other command & control components. All of the
On 10/16/2012 7:00 PM, Michael Haberler wrote:
> Seb,
>
>
> Am 16.10.2012 um 23:14 schrieb Sebastian Kuzminsky:
>
>> On 10/16/12 13:48 , Michael Haberler wrote:
>>> while several folks have been working on new realtime OS foundations, it
>>> has become clear that the current configure support is i
Seb,
Am 16.10.2012 um 23:14 schrieb Sebastian Kuzminsky:
> On 10/16/12 13:48 , Michael Haberler wrote:
>> while several folks have been working on new realtime OS foundations, it has
>> become clear that the current configure support is inadaequate.
>>
>> I wrote up a proposal how to resolve t
On 10/16/12 13:48 , Michael Haberler wrote:
> while several folks have been working on new realtime OS foundations, it has
> become clear that the current configure support is inadaequate.
>
> I wrote up a proposal how to resolve this, and ask for comments.
>
> http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wik
while several folks have been working on new realtime OS foundations, it has
become clear that the current configure support is inadaequate.
I wrote up a proposal how to resolve this, and ask for comments.
http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?RealtimeConfiguratonProposal
Barring better prop
10 matches
Mail list logo
