[Emc-developers] uspace

2020-06-13 Thread andy pugh
Is there an expectation that a uspace package would work on whatever realtime system it found itself on, or would we need separate builds for preempt-rt, xenomai and rtai-lxrt? I did try the experiment of running the current buildbot 2.8-preemtrt package on an RTAI system and it chose to use POSIX

Re: [Emc-developers] uspace

2020-06-13 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 13 June 2020 20:53:36 andy pugh wrote: > Is there an expectation that a uspace package would work on whatever > realtime system it found itself on, or would we need separate builds > for preempt-rt, xenomai and rtai-lxrt? What diff would it make if you are spinning an iso? Spin it fo

Re: [Emc-developers] uspace

2020-06-13 Thread Valerio Bellizzomi
On Sat, 2020-06-13 at 23:40 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Saturday 13 June 2020 20:53:36 andy pugh wrote: > > > Is there an expectation that a uspace package would work on whatever > > realtime system it found itself on, or would we need separate builds > > for preempt-rt, xenomai and rtai-lxrt?

[Emc-developers] "uspace plus": Ready for testing and code-review

2016-07-17 Thread Jeff Epler
"Uspace plus", which I originally called "uspace+rtai", is a modification of uspace realtime to support a total of 4 modes with a single build (depending on the availabiliy of headers for the RTAI and Xenomai modes): * LXRT realtime with RTAI kernel * "Posix Skin" realtime with Xenomai kern

Re: [Emc-developers] "uspace plus": Ready for testing and code-review

2016-07-17 Thread Sebastian Kuzminsky
On 07/17/2016 11:36 AM, Jeff Epler wrote: > "Uspace plus", which I originally called "uspace+rtai", is a > modification of uspace realtime to support a total of 4 modes > with a single build (depending on the availabiliy of headers for the > RTAI and Xenomai modes): > * LXRT realtime with RTAI