Re: New Canadian Marking Requirement?

1996-06-06 Thread LITTLEWORF
Yes abosolutely - We're applying the new marking @ STK, Louisville CO.

RE: Radioactive materials in ITE?

1996-06-06 Thread Cameron, Danny C
Hello Mr Brister; Our company produces monitors, and as such is under the auspices of the venerable DHHS for non-ionizing radiation emitted by same, could this be what the customers in question are curious about? Danny C. Cameron Product Safety Engineer Compliance Engineering Department

Radioactive materials in ITE?

1996-06-06 Thread PS INCIDENT MGT. 223-8141
Hi, Every now and then we received customer inquiries as to whether there are any radioactive materials used in our products. To my knowledge none of our products contain such materials. I would be interested in knowing if anyone has had experience with the use of such materials in ITE(compute

FWD>RE>FWD>Temperature Test

1996-06-06 Thread Heber Farnsworth
Mail*Link(r) SMTP FWD>RE>FWD>Temperature Test Equ OOPS! Fluke changed the model number after I left. They also expanded the line. The "Hydra" series, models 2620A, 2625A, 2635A, are the products I was referring to. They operate as either stand-alone or over a network. Fluke also has

Optical Switch, Laser

1996-06-06 Thread tbao
A laser optical switch takes a beam of laser as input and convert it to fit different kinds of fiber media, if I understand its function correctly. The switch itself does not generate any laser signal. Is such a device subject to CDRH or IEC 825 requirements? I'm not very much in tune with laser r

NO SUBJECT

1996-06-06 Thread bryans
From: Bill Bryans ' IBM Canada Ltd., Program Manager, National Requirements ' Subject: ICES-003 Just a slight correction to the referenced 'Grace' period. All 'new' equipment tested and introduced to commerce after April 1, 1995 require a Product Label. The 'Grace' period to April 1, 19

re: Medical directive class IIa

1996-06-06 Thread ndevine
In answer to your question regarding the "difference". Please see the last paragraph of Article 11, paragraph 2. It states that "Instead of applying these procedures, the manufacture may also follow the procedure referred to in paragraph 3 (a)." Paragraph 3(a) calls out Annex II with point

Re: EMC severity levels: an update

1996-06-06 Thread RTFlinders
Paul, I have had the opportunity to work with many manufacturers on Electrostatic Discharge Testing and have found that many companies do maintain internal test specifications which exceed the commercial, industrial, and military requirements. While some companies go as far as to create entirely

How many Directives ???

1996-06-06 Thread Peter E. Perkins
PSNet Nick Rouse has done a good job (again) explaining the need for and use of competent bodies. I sense, by the questions that keep raising their ugly heads over and over, that some folks are looking for some definitive answers as to which requirements (and approval routes) that apply