Terry,
I believe it depends on whether you ship the end product with or
without the power supply. If you ship the end product with the power
supply, I don't think you need the electrical ratings on the end
product. However, if the supply does not ship with the
Please send the following notice:
The OU-EMC Center will be sponsoring an EMC Forum on Sept.11 at
Washington DC. Given below is a brief description of the Forum.
It may be of interest to you or your colleagues. The registration fee
is $200 for the forum. Please contact me if you need
We have a product for non-residential use that is powered by a line
frequency a.c. power pack. With a 230 V a.c. power pack, the product has
been tested by a NATA accredited laboratory and meets EN55022: 1995 Class
A.
If we source a UL approved 115 V a.c. power pack, is it necessary to
Just received a correction from a good friend in Japan.
The correct Internet e-mail ID for Mr. Yamaguchi is:
qwl01...@niftyserve.or.jp
Thanks Fuji!
Regards,
Egon
Greetings,
CSA can provide all the CSA logos on diskette or photo-ready sheets. Just ask
anybody at CSA.
Also, several years ago, I bought a diskette with Windows type True-Type fonts
made by Agfa. It includes a couple of fonts called Industry Eng. which have
such goodies as logos for CSA,
In response to Pete Tarver's info about the Furukawa TEX-E, we had to check on
this a couple of months ago for one of our clients.
Pete's right about the Annex U not applying to the Furukawa wire under Amd. 3.
However, Furukawa petitioned the standard committee, and the notes from the
To: emc-p...@ieee.org@INTERNET; r...@auratek.com@INTERNET
From: Clement_D on Thu, Aug 29, 1996 7:03 PM
Subject: RE: UL labels, Graphics
From: r...@auratek.com@INTERNET on Thu, Aug 29, 1996 4:22 PM
I'm looking for UL logo labels to place on the outside of a UL approved
box. Maybe 1/4 diameter
Item Subject: UL labels, Graphics
Received: from hpcc01.corp.hp.com by hpcc08.corp.hp.com with ESMTP
(1.37.109.16/15.5+ECS 3.4 Openmail) id AA240694492; Thu, 29 Aug 1996
14:34:53 -0700
Received: from hp.com by hpcc01.corp.hp.com with ESMTP
(1.37.109.16/15.5+ECS 3.3) id
Rod,
I think you will have to make sure your tests (to Class A)
comply with the FCC Part 15 test setup (which differs
somewhat from CISPR-22 -- see ANSI C63.4) and also include
tests above 1 GHz if the equipment has clocks of 108 MHz
Robert,
My experience has been that separating logic ground from the
D-sub shell on a plug-in card is not necessarily a good
idea. When you evaluate this card, please check it not only
on a system you know is a good performer for
Hi,
The stackup you describe combined with the split in the power planes is of
concern to me. I have labelled them with numbers as shown below
to discuss a few issues.
The stackup is:
S (layer 1)
S (layer 2)
P (layer 3)
S
Hello,
I'm looking for UL logo labels to place on the outside of a UL approved
box. Maybe 1/4 diameter would work. Anyone know sources for such
things ? Also, does anyone know of a collection of cliparts or
graphics that inlude things like the UL logo, universal safety
markings etc. ?
Mike,
Thanks for the information. I wish I had tried moving the wires against
the chassis or putting ferrites on the fan wires.
I'm not sure what I could do about this from a practical view point,
though, except to look for another PC. I doubt if the FCC would allow
you to modify the PC.
Max
Somehow I could not send the following message through internet:
Anybody who is aware of disposal requirements for Ni-Cad batteries please
let me know, there may be some requirements in California, I am not sure.
If you have any info please let me know.
Sushil Gour
tel: 901 377-7387 X 486
Fax
From: V. Gasse, Product Safety Authority.TEL 49-(0)7031-16-6796
IBM, Technical Relations Germany,..FAX 49-(0)7031-16-6916
Egon,
being a member of the mentioned TC74 workgroup I would like to
point out, that Amd.4 of IEC 950 still only allows polyimid or FEP
wires to be used in Scl. 2.9.4.4
15 matches
Mail list logo
