I see postings concerning EMC meetings in other parts of the U.S. Are there
any similar meetings in southern California?
Pat Lawler
plaw...@west.net
With due trepidation for advertising, etc.
We offer such a service; please email
karenev...@icc-uk.com
Dave Wilson
ICC
__ Reply Separator _
Subject: English Translations
Author: MIME:jo...@cor.
Paul Ramplebergh, in Belgium, is trying to use a scanner for precompliance. He's
had some problems with the authorities there -- they don't want to let anyone
have a scanner that could receive unlicensed frequencies. I have some problems
with using an inexpensive scanner for compliance, but not fo
EEI CORPORATION SEMINAR PROGRAM - OPEN SESSION SCHEDULE - HOT TOPICS FOR 1997!
Enclosed is our training schedule of open session for 1997. Not to crowd your
email, we have only listed the courses, dates, location and cost for the
following hot topics. Please inquire by providing tel, fax and ma
Hello again,
I'm interested in the potential use of low cost scanners as "low end"
receivers\spectrum analyzers. My problem is I don't know anything about how
they work, what are the inherent limitations (freq accuracy, amplitude accuracy
etc). I'm thinking of course about the synthesised ones
How much and what kind of training do you need? The IEEE has a full
series of training videos for EMC, but not directly applicable to "field
work". UMiss-Rolla may also be able to provide some.
Bob Martin
EMC Department Manager
ITS-Boxborough
rfmar...@world.std.com
--
From: Itzik Baruch
T
I am trying to understand the requirements and the rationale behind the
Insulation co-ordination Impulse tests of IEC664, IEC1010-1, etc.
Were these impulse levels determined by testing?
If so does a report on the testing exist in a location that I can access?
I assume testing was done and a m
BS EN 41003: 1997, the UK edition of the CENELEC document EN 41003: 1996,
is now available from BSI. This now supersedes the previous revision of
this standard (BS EN 41003: 1993) following the publication of amendment
A3: 1995 of EN 60950.
Readers may be particularly interested in the first two
Good remark from Richard Hughes about EN 41003. Taking into account that EN
60950 +a1+a2+a3 includes "equipment to be connected directly to a
TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORK . regardless of the source of power",
Does anybody know an example in which EN 60950 does not apply and EN 41003 yes?
Does
9 matches
Mail list logo