RE: Ringing wave surge testing for Modem

2000-09-11 Thread Mike Hopkins
Also, refer to IEC 61000-4-5 section on telecom and FCC Part 68 for surge testing modems. Mike Hopkins KeyTek -Original Message- From: j...@aol.com [mailto:j...@aol.com] Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 11:19 AM To: matt.aschenb...@echostar.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Re:

Re: Hot Flaming Oil Test

2000-09-11 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Ed: Great description of your test technique. BTW, I would think that the temperature of the oil in the ladle should be specified, as this seems to be a critical variable. The temperature of the oil is established by the 1-minute burn period (in the ladle) BEFORE the oil is

FCC and pwr levels

2000-09-11 Thread RON_CHERNUS
Hi all, I'm looking for information on lowering conducted power output on a cell phone. The EUT is under FCC part 22/24 certification. I am aware of the requirement to regrant a phone with a increase of power output. Does the FCC care about a decrease in power output to the antenna? Cell phone

Re: Ringing wave surge testing for Modem

2000-09-11 Thread JPR3
In a message dated 8/31/00, Matt Aschenberg writes: The fast transient has a ringing (underdamped) wave form. Our primary concern is to protect the modem against lightening surges. We currently test to 6kV underdamped and overdamped. Hi Matt: If your primary concern is lightning

RE: Hot Flaming Oil Test

2000-09-11 Thread Price, Ed
Rich: Great description of your test technique. BTW, I would think that the temperature of the oil in the ladle should be specified, as this seems to be a critical variable. Regards, Ed -Original Message- From: Rich Nute [mailto:ri...@sdd.hp.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 06,

RE: 90 V gas-filled arrestors source?

2000-09-11 Thread Mike Hopkins
You can also get coupler/decouplers that meet the spec from KeyTek (1-800-753-9835) and other manufacturers. Mike Hopkins KeyTek -Original Message- From: Dan Kinney (A) [mailto:dan.kin...@heapg.com] Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 1:37 PM To: David Gelfand; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org

RE: 90 V gas-filled arrestors source?

2000-09-11 Thread Mike Hopkins
An MOV won't work - it's a clamping device as opposed to a crowbar device. Gas filled arrestors are common in the telecom industry -- try CP Clare, Reltech (near Chicago), TII New York, Sankosha, Shinko, --- probably others, but can't remember them. Good luck Mike Hopkins KeyTek

Immunity Uncertainty

2000-09-11 Thread Tudor, Allen
This question is in regard to the radiated immunity test specified in section 3.3 of GR-1089-CORE in which the test signal is 80% AM modulated with a 1KHz tone. In testing analog voiceband channels for idle channel noise per section 3.5.3(c) of GR-1089-CORE, we have been using a Transmission

PC's Class B..

2000-09-11 Thread George Sparacino
Hello All, I will be buying a new PC for EMI/EMC testing. Can anyone suggest a mfgr. / model that is (truely) Class B compliant? Thanks, George

RE: R: R: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports

2000-09-11 Thread David_Sterner
The defined I/O coupling methods for EN55022:1997 do not appear to accurately depict real-world shielding provided by twisted pair wiring, almost as if the test method were rigged against passing EMI with T-P cable. Considerable study went into development of

FCC Verification Testing

2000-09-11 Thread Don Clayton
Just a quick question: Company A sells a non-residential ITE device which has passed FCC class A and has outside test lab. test report. Company B wants to re-label company A's product and sell it to be operated and installed as described in A's manuals. Can Company B use A's report as proof

Saferty Standards

2000-09-11 Thread Chaplis, Bob
Hello Group: Can any one tell me the CSA and IEC safety standards that would be applicaple for the following equipment catagories: 1. X Ray Equipment that is used in the industrial sector for use in repair of printed circuit boards 2. Repair stations that utilize hot air and optics

RE: FCC Verification Testing

2000-09-11 Thread George Sparacino
Hello Don, Company B should obtain company A's permission to use the reports. Further, Company B may want to negotiate that Company A have company B's model # added to the report. George -Original Message- From: Don Clayton [mailto:dclay...@nccn.net] Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000

Re: FCC Verification Testing

2000-09-11 Thread Ron Pickard
Hi Don, Company B wants to OEM company A's product and assume that company A has, in fact, done their job. hmmm I would assume (ugh, there's that word again) that since you only referred to the FCC, this product is only targeting the USA. In that light and in the test report, does the