Chris, Chris, Chris.
How can I get the flames of discontent spreading around the globe if
you are always mediating things - heavy sigh!
Richard made a very similar point this morning and I don't have a
problem with testing to the EMC and Safety standards. Do it all ready - I
just
I have only read a couple of the lighter responses to the question of
electric fence voltages and was amused. However, in case the original
poster was researching an existing livestock problem, there is a problem,
usually referred to as "stray voltage," that affects dairy and other
animals. It h
Not bad, you may have missed your calling !
oover...@lexmark.com wrote:
> This was quite a moooving exchange.Gert was obviously on the horns of a
> dilema.
Even though there was a lot at steak, I believe that Gert was steered in the
right direction.
In addition to the voltage, the current would
This was quite a moooving exchange.
Gert was obviously on the horns of a dilema.
Even though there was a lot at steak, I believe that Gert was steered in the
right direction.
In addition to the voltage, the current would depend on whether your beef was
ground(ed) but you can't hide from the real ri
Thanks for your replies; i know it's a funny question
but it seems that cows really care ..
Regards,
Gert Gremmen, (Ing)
Ce-test, qualified testing
==
Web presence http://www.cetest.nl
CE-shop http://www.cetest.nl/ce_shop.htm
/-/ Compliance testing is our cor
Chris -
The following quote from your message addresses, I believe, the essence of
the debate:
So, if we assume that the device already meets ITE standards for EMC
and
Safety? What more testing would the R&TTE directive require? I'm
just
wondering if the device would b
It seems -- in our haste to include USB handsets under the Directive -- we
have ignored computer microphones. Yet the microphone -- if the handset is
subject -- SHOULD be subject to it. It is no less likely to be used for
communications than a handset connected to the computer, once we are doing
V
My company doesn't have any USB products (yet), so I'm just an innocent
bystander. But sometimes a bystander can provide a "mediating" point of
view. (or maybe stir things up a little)
What if I were to play devil's advocate? What if we assume that the R&TTE
directive did apply? What if we also
By the logic presented by Theo, if you surf the Internet via your TV (cable
modem and the rest), even your TV or the remote becomes a subject of the
R&TTE! There must be a demarcation point, and I think that Richard is
correct.
I am including the following disclaimer which I got from an earlier
c
John, et al.
I intended to mention that earlier but left it out.
I agree with the volume control and that has an applicable section
in the safety standards for that. I would imagine, but don't know for
certain that there are industry standards for the functional features
All,
For a non-radio USB device, if you meet the essential requirements of the
LVD and EMCD, don't you meet the R&TTE essential requirements too? Why the
argument? Put all three on your DoC and call it a day!
Regards,
Paul Hare
p.s. - I still hold the position that there are a couple of Part
Let's think about this logically. I have a PC with a microphone and speakers
that allows me to speak with persons using the internet. Does that mean that
my PC, monitor, keyboard, microphone and/or speakers form part of a
telecommuncations terminal. I don't think so. Now I get smart and replace
m
The Curtis-Straus Update (formerly Conformity-Update) for the week
ending Nov. 10, 2000 is now available at:
http://www.conformity-update.com
This week's headlines are:
FCC TCB PROGRAM -- IT WORKS.
FCC'S ULTRA WIDE BAND RULES RAISE A RUCKUS.
FCC LAYS OUT BATTLE PLANS FOR ENFORCEMENT.
LAB CERTIF
I would like to thank anyone who visited this forum yesterday. It has been
brought to my
attention that the E-mail-this-to a friend and E-mail notify (if someone
responds to your post)
features are not working properly and have been turned off.
It seems that our mail server has a filter in pl
Hello group,
It is my understanding that Group 2 devices as per the standard
definition are devices that use electromagnetic radiation for the
treatment of material and spark erosion equipment. In Annex A, under
Group 2 the standard declares Thyristor-controlled equipment. My
question relates to
Dear all,
The R&TTE is meant for terminals. If my message was not clear enough I
repeat here once again the R&TTE scope (see below). I disagree with Gary
regarding his statement that an USB telephone, computers and other
indirectly connected stuff are not falling under the R&TTE scope
(connected d
16 matches
Mail list logo
