Greeting group,
I am currently looking for quotes for a 3 meter anechoic chamber. Anyone
know of any sources as well as rough estimates on costs?
Thanks,
Ken Matsuda
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-p
Oh . . .how I WISH that were the case!!!
With all due respect, you may want to re-consider using that
source for regulatory information . . .
John Juhasz
Fiber Options
Bohemia, NY
-Original Message-
From: Courtland Thomas [mailto:ctho...@patton.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 5:51
Micheal,
My understanding of this scenario is that as long as the unit for repair
stayed with in the EU. There is no problem provided it is sent to the
original customer.
If the product leaves the EU then it must meet the new requirements.
Josh
-Original Message-
From: michael.garret...
No way Courtland,
Immunity test are not the first priority of governmental officers,
that may have tempted someone to overlook these requirements.
Regards,
Gert Gremmen, (Ing)
ce-test, qualified testing
===
Web presence http://www.cetest.nl
CE-shop
resend - didn't see original post
> -Original Message-
> From: Crane, Lauren
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 11:15 AM
> To: 's...@world.std.com'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> Subject: HCFC ban in Europe - EC reg 2037/2000
>
> Summary ===
>
> The EC "oz
Hello group,
I have heard that the Radiated Immunity test is not required for 'CE'. I
don't recall reading that anywhere, so I would like to know what the story
is.
Thanks,
Courtland Thomas
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Te
Dear List,
Can anyone provide reference to the correct European Standards on length of
time service and support must be maintained for a product? (ie. five years,
ten years, etc.)
Also, what are the appropriate EN documents relating to the vibration and
shock that instruments must withstand dur
>"Dear Valued Regulatory Test Solution Customer,
>Agilent Technologies has recently made a strategic decision regarding our
>acsource product family..."
>"...to withdraw from the EMI compliance market. So, within a frame
>of less than five years, I have a $13,000 software investment which
>is n
Thanks to everyone who responded to my questions regarding EN61000-3-2 / 3-3.
This was a great help as the responses were very clear and consistent. At
least for now, I have a much better understanding of these standards and their
scope.
Craig Hensley
Iomega Corp.
>>> Craig Hensley 01/03/01
Group:
I ran into an interesting curve on 61000-3-2/-3-3 that I wanted to make
sure I dealt with appropriately. In our efforts to requalify our products
for these requirements we handled most of the situations we could come up
with, but the one area I missed was our Service department. We have
If I may interject my opinion here . . .
On only two occassions have I had to provide a report to back-up my DoC.
The laboratory has their accreditations listed at the bottom of the cover
page. I did not receive any further queries about the data or the lab
that performed it.
Was it because the
Gary,
you make this statement...
Besides I have never seen a cost impact on using an accredited lab, and
knowing that my test lab reads this forum, I had better not see one (Morning,
Paul and Jim), so it just doesn't seem prudent to me not to use an accredited
lab
I charge $600/day for membe
Gary,
Good points, but the fact remains that laboratory accreditation is not
required for testing to the EMC Directive in Europe. It is my opinion that
they got this one right. If we are going to have lab accreditation, it
should be in the country in which the lab is located and then accepted w
Summary ===
The EC "ozone regulation" No. 2037/2000 does, indeed, prohibit the use of
HCFC's as early as 1/1/00. In fact, some uses of HCFC's as early as 1/1/96.
The trick to reading this regulation is to understand that the prohibition
dates are scheduled according to the
Ghery,
Personal opinion time.
You may want to re-think the Europe thing. Even if you are correct
that you don't currently need them for Europe, accredited labs are really
the underpinnings for global acceptance of EMC data (Okay - not Korea but
don't get me started on them for the
I have spent the last couple of days ploughing through EN61000-3-2, it's
amendment A14, IEC1000-4-7 and the HP harmonics application note 1273. I am
90% sure that I can continue using the 6842A for compliance measurements but
I would love to have some confirmation. I have tried asking Agilent bu
The attached draft decision> was published in the Official Journal of the
European Communities on> 19 December 2000.
>
>
<> > <>
Richard Woods
ce36520001219en02560261.pdf
Description: Binary data
ce36520001219en02560261.pdf
Description: Binary data
As I recall, the requirements for label durability came years ago from
UL, where the original test specified kerosene.
As the standards evolved, propagated and became international, the term
kerosene was complained about since it varied worldwide. In attempts to
be more specific, someone came
The Curtis-Straus Update for the week ending Dec. 29, 2000 is now
available at:
http://www.conformity-update.com
This week's headlines are:
FCC MAY REQUIRE UNIQUE ID FOR ALL.
GE DISHWASHER DEBACLE CONTINUES.
EU BREAKS IMPASSE, PREPARES FOR ENLARGEMENT.
EU PONDERS A BILL OF RIGHTS.
THE IEC'S LA
I bought the HP-8571A Receiver System and an HP Series 300 Workstation, with
the associated HP-85869A EMI Acquisition software ($8000) about 5 years ago.
When the workstation developed a problem about three years ago, I found I
could replace the workstation with a PC (by buying the HP-85869PC and
NSA above 1 GHz becomes (technically spoken) less relevant , as it
becomes increasingly easier to calibrate antennas as if they
were used in free space. The short wavelength makes is easy to choose
the antenna-antenna distance very short compared to the height of them.
In this way reflections are
>>We might be trying to make a mountain out of a molehill here.
I agree that a mountain is being made of a molehill - however, I think the
TC made the mountain, not those of us who have tried to interpret the
mountain.
For my part, I have posted this exact question in the past and found the
same
Mike, in C63.4, the project number is 1-13.2. The contact is Michael
Windler.
michael.j.wind...@us.ul.com
>From the latest C63 Newsletter:
"The key issues being addressed in this project include ground plane
influences, site reflections and practical frequency limits to the
traditional method
23 matches
Mail list logo
