forwarding for: bay...@aol.com
Reply Separator
Subject:Japan
Author: bay...@aol.com
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: 1/17/01 12:57 PM
Has anyone had any experience with a Japan MITI law that requires a minimum
insulation resistance
Folks-
Can someone give the scope of UL 3111-1? Or tell me how is it's scope
differs from UL 3101-1?
I have a copy of UL 3101-1, and it appears that it is very similar to IEC
1010-1, but I don't have a copy of UL 3111-1 (yet!).
I read a message in the IEEE-PSTC archive where someone said that
There is an ASTM (I do not recall the number) for just your purpose. The
jig is an expanded piece of coax, with a slot into which a puck of the test
material may be inserted. If the material is a perfect conductor, it shorts
the input and you get no output. If the material is a perfect
Ken,
a jig like you describe was made and marketed by Elgal in the USA. It was
called a SET 19 I believe.
Derek.
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription,
Antonio,
When I was a little younger, we tested a bunch of panels to help determine the
make up of an aircraft structure. Our panels were about 10 by 18.
We did the testing by putting the panel in the shared wall between two shield
rooms, creating a field in one, then measuring the field in
Does anyone know of any EU requirements/certifications necessary for Telecom
Housing Units as outlined below?
Thanks in advance,
Pryor McGinnis
c...@prodigy.net
Product Specification
Exterior Dimensions: 10' wide x 12 long x 9' 6 high
Interior Dimensions: 9'3'' wide x 11' 3 long x 8' high
Chris, I'm not so familiar in what the European labs can offer, but I
believe that Hermon Labs in Israel can provide these services (and more).
Feel free to contact her...@netvision.net.il and ask for Dr. Edward Usoskin
or Gonen Usishkin.
Feel free to post your findings.
Regards,
Naftali Shani,
Hello group,
I am interested in knowing if anyone has run into compliance issues
concerning Baluns. Is there any testing required where CE is concerned? The
unit is a passive device so I don't see where the EMC or LVD directives
apply. Any information on this would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Dear Group,
I have a task assigned and I don't know where to begin. I'll be
as descriptive as I can and look forward to hearing your
comments/suggestions.
Within our company it has been suggested that the fiberglass
body that acts as a structural support (a sort of
Brent,
I just went through this exercise and the FCC section you want to pay
attention to is
Sec. 2.803 Marketing of radio frequency devices prior to equipment
authorization.
(a) Except as provided elsewhere in this section, no person shall sell
or lease, or offer for sale or lease
I believe that Clause 7.2 contains an error.
Clause 6.2.1 requires the field variation be no more than +/- 3 dB over the
volume of the EUT. For a 1 m square loop, the test volume is 0.6 m x 0.6 m x
0.5 m (h) with the loop centered on the test volume. Therefore, a vertically
oriented loop would
The device will need CE, thus the typical route is a tech file and a DoC.
Refer to the Medical Device Directive (MDD) or the In-Vitro directive. From
the little info you provided I would guess the Medical Directive is the one.
Reading the scope of both should assist you in selecting the
Hi! Cortland:
Thanks for your comments. In your experience, does the size/spacing of the
copper dots or islands matter as long as their dimension is much smaller than
the wavelength for the highest possible frequency on the card ? Any special
considerations other than that ?
Regards
Perry
Brent:
So far as the US is concerned, it is generally OK in limited quantities. You
will need to label them as not for sale and not FCC approved. DO NOT sell
them before certification or DOC, or at least not without a conditional
sales agreement. All the details are in the FCC rules (WORD file)
Many a good conversation veers off onto other interesting threads
and indeed this is one of the things I enjoy about reading the various
messages even those that have no direct impact on me.
Sorry you felt ignored, although as I followed it the first
responses did address the
Hi group,
Thanks to those who had given their precious advice.
Regards
Koh
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
majord...@ieee.org
with
I appreciate the comments that I have received, but no one is answering my
question, which is, can tall ( 0.5 m) equipment be tested using a single
horizontal 1 m loop that is moved along the height of the equipment?
Obviously, a larger loop is required for the vertical testing.
Richard Woods
Kim,
Check out
http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/newapproach/standardization/harmstds/re
flist.html
From that page you can get to both the In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices
Directive and the Medical Devices Directive, as well as the Harmonised
Standards for these Directives.
It sounds
Good point Lothar,
it was about time that the original technical grounds and limitations of CE
method were brought up.
Just one additional point: with the ever increasing operating frequencies
of many electronic products, box and/or PCB level radiation is getting more
and more important vs
Hi all
Can some one give me links to information regarding EU Medical Devices
directive.
My problem is to define the requirement for the following situation:
A manufacturer is making an add-on device for another company's medical
device and the total equipment is CE approved without involving
Yes indeed. My preference is for thieving to be done with dots or
islands small with respect to the shortest wavelength of concern. This is
because thieving can be constructed so as to resonate and aggravate an EMI
problem.
Some years ago, at an employer far away (grin), we had obtained
Dear group,
I am confused with the the tests applicable to CD Player according to EN55013.
Do I perform radiated emission test?
From FCC Part 15 experience, CD players fail this test sometimes. Please
advise.
Thanks and Regards
Paul Chan
Hong Kong Standards and Testing Centre
I would surmise the following, and would appreciate if Mr. Cameron could
confirm / correct as appropriate:
Victim equipmentFI threshold proper control
IR motion sensors100 mV/m RI
car alarms 100 mV/m RI
garage door openers uV/m RE/better
Richard, our approach has been to size the loop to the EUT. We presently
have 1 meter and 2 meter (square) loops that are multi-turn conductors
inside 3/4-inch thickwall white PVC. Our 3 meter multi-turn loop uses
external supports, and is designed with a multi-conductor plug and socket so
that
Hi,
I'm looking for test facilities in Europe or Asia that can perform tests for
Bellcore (better now TelCordia) GR-1089-CORE?
Thanks for any information.
Chris Collin
Find the best deals on the web at AltaVista Shopping!
http://www.shopping.altavista.com
Sorry, the attachment called EMCAB-1, Elecrtomagnetic Compatibility
Bulletin -1 is 230K of PDF format so it exceeds the server limit.
If any one is interested i will send it to you separately.
Ralph Cameron
- Original Message -
From: Price, Ed ed.pr...@cubic.com
To: EMC-PCST (E-mail)
William:
The British Ministry of Defence maintains a nice web site at:
http://www.dstan.mod.uk/
I'm not familiar with a 911 document, but you can always ask MoD about it.
Ed
Ed Price
ed.pr...@cubic.com
Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab
Cubic Defense Systems
San Diego, CA. USA
Anyone with experience in applying any of the standards in the subject, I
would
appreciate your comments.
Product in question:
DC supplied Independant Electronic Ballast for Metal Halide lamp.
30V DC in, Max Power 250W. Max output 300V (Pulse voltage)
Ignitor fitted in remote lamphead.
28 matches
Mail list logo