2001 RMCEMC Symposium Advance Notice

2001-08-28 Thread ChasGrasso
To all interested parties (especially those who could not get to Montreal!!) The Rocky Mountain Chapter (RMC) of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Society will hold its 11th annual Regional EMC Symposium on Wednesday, October 3rd, 20

Re: EN61800-3:1996 Specification

2001-08-28 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Hart, Michael wrote (in <9efd49e2fb59d411aaba0008c7e675c004a41...@emss04m10.ems.lmco.com>) about 'EN61800-3:1996 Specification', on Tue, 28 Aug 2001: >With respect to the immunity requirements, can someone please tell me what >immunity tests (radiated immunity, ESD, EFT,

Re: EN61000-3-2,3

2001-08-28 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that William D'Orazio wrote (in <1c89780c4179d3118c580090277193580fbcc...@caemsx01.cae.ca>) about 'EN61000-3-2,3', on Tue, 28 Aug 2001: >My understanding of EN61000-3-2,3 is that they are applicable to the >power input terminals of equipment intended to be connected to system

August, 2001 EMC/Telco/Product Safety Update Now Available

2001-08-28 Thread Glen Dash
The Curtis-Straus Update is for August, 2001 is now available at: http://www.conformity-update.com The headlines are: Reprieve: You Can Use EN 55022:1994 For Two More Years. UK: Even EN 55022:1998 Is Not Tough Enough. New Standards For The EMC And R&TTE Directives. The FCC Officially Out

ETSI dimensions

2001-08-28 Thread Dave Wilson
Does anyone have a feel for how close the spacing requirements in ETS 300 119 have to be met? There doesn't seem to be any tolerances, mins or maxes, i.e. the implication is that all dimensions must be met exactly. Anyone fallen down in Europe over this? Also, in ETS 300 119-4 it seems that D1 is

EN61800-3:1996 Specification

2001-08-28 Thread Hart, Michael
I currently have a motor controller from an outside vendor which lists compliance to the EN61800-3:1996 requirements. I'm attempting to correlate the frequency ranges evaluated and the applicable limits tested under EN61800-3 to the equivalent MIL-STD-461 requirements. According to the manufac

Re: Burn-in methods

2001-08-28 Thread Doug McKean
Just to add to what others have said, I was assuming single no redundancy failure mode. If the product being tested has m-of-n redundancy, things get very complicated very quickly. In other words, if a shelf of 8 modules can continue to run after 2 of the modules fail, that product has a

RE: Susceptibility level of medical devices (incubator) - urgent!

2001-08-28 Thread Ned Devine
Hi, Per the FDA guidance on EMC http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/638.pdf The limit is 3 V/m. See the page numbered 25 of the document. Note: This is for general medical equipment! There is a guidance document for incubators http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/incubator.html It references IEC 60601-2-19 an

EN61000-3-2,3

2001-08-28 Thread William D'Orazio
Gents, My understanding of EN61000-3-2,3 is that they are applicable to the power input terminals of equipment intended to be connected to systems with 240/415-250/430V operating at 50-60Hz. Therefore if 480 V is supplied to a building, with a local transformer to step the voltage down t

Burn-in methods

2001-08-28 Thread georgea
First, I am no expert on accelerated life testing. However, I do know that life testing depends a good deal on the nature of the product. In other words, how will it be used, how often will it be used, and what are its failure modes? An electric pencil sharpener may be used only five to ten t

RE: Burn-in methods

2001-08-28 Thread David Spencer
Hi Massimo, Doug and Tania have the right idea. Basically, you want to find a combination of operational and non-operational temperature excursions that identify early life failures and manufacturing defects. This is going to be very specific to your product. A successful burn-in programs has t

please no advertising Ed

2001-08-28 Thread Stuart Lopata
I don't think this is what they had in mind for this emc site! I was actually hoping for some free tips. "The cost of the Manufacturers Guide to Safety Agency Submittal is now available for the low price of $ 49.95 (US Dollars) (A small price to pay when compared to the cost of an agency or

RE: Burn-in methods

2001-08-28 Thread Chris Maxwell
Massimo, Have you checked into the Reliability Analysis Center?? They are located at the former Griffiss Air Force Base in Rome, NY. Electronics reliability is their sole purpose in life. They may be able to help you out (for a small fee :-) You should be able to find them on the web by lookin

Re: CE test suite for computers

2001-08-28 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that George, David L wrote (in <3B10FF0A008FF6458711E6E375E830412C16A6@USTR- EXCH2.na.uis.unisys.com>) about 'CE test suite for computers', on Mon, 27 Aug 2001: >John: >After all your years on the committee and having heard all the technical >arguments, I am surprised the comm

Re: Burn-in methods

2001-08-28 Thread Tania Grant
Massimo, I have no experience with medical devices, and there may be formal protocols that are recommended. Here are a few that I've observed performed on ITE equipment for non-medical applications. 168 hours burn-in in a heat/humidity chamber, error free;-- if something fails, it is fixed or

RE: Burn-in methods

2001-08-28 Thread Doug McKean
Massimo Polignano wrote: > > What kind of thermal cycling (temperature limits and test duration) to > accelerate one year of life? Accelerate one year of normal life to what - a month, a week? Very difficult to say. And highly statistical to get sufficient confidence level. All based on th