Greeetings all,
Does anyone know of isolation transformers for LAN or Telecom tht have agency
approvals for safety isolation? I am intersted in single dual or quad
pacakges that are http://12.9.181.228
ProductFinder/index.cfm?fuseaction=Home.MainCategoryID=1429 10 Base-T
performance or better.
I believe Mr. Cuthbert is correct, but that doesn't change the fact that
CISPR 16 specifies 6 dB bandwidths.
From: drcuthb...@micron.com
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 15:47:55 -0600
To: ken.ja...@emccompliance.com, cgrassospri...@earthlink.net,
emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: Q. on Res Bandwith
Chris,
do they really need the gas tubes and MOV's or are these components someone's
insurance or empirical engineering?
Dave Cuthbert
Micron Technology
From: Chris Maxwell [mailto:chris.maxw...@nettest.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:38 PM
To: Rich Nute
Cc:
Here's a good National Semiconductor ap note on electrical noise that I ran
into again after several years. I'm presently in the process of performing
some 1/f and thermal noise measurements.
http://www.national.com/search/search.cgi/apnotes?keywords=noise
Click on ap note 104
Hello List,
I friend of mine is manufacturing a device for surge protection (for
residential, commercial and industrial environments) and he is interested in
selling this equipment in the European Market.
I'd like to know which european standards (EN's, IEC) are related to this
kind of device.
I read in !emc-pstc that Brewster, Alan alan.brews...@novellus.com
wrote (in CF6DCEDA22787446978A697FEB9B20DC045FB304@msxsanjose2.novellus
.com) about 'Product standard for telescope' on Thu, 28 Aug 2003:
the EN55014's for household apparatus, for example.
I don't see that a telescope would
Does anyone know what standards would cover Amateur Radio Antennas in Europe?
Dave Cuthbert
Micron Technology
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
To
Thanks for the response.
It's hard to say. I wasn't there for the hipot test. I just saw the
aftermath.
A little background:
The unit under test had a power supply which we designed from off the shelf
building blocks. The first building block is a rectifier/doubler, which takes
the AC
My understanding is that it is the 6 dB points which are cited as the
bandwidth. I'm not up on CISPR 16 but to entirely specify the bandwidth the
60 dB down points are also specified. The slope you get from the 6 dB to
the 60 dB points is called the shape factor.
From: Charles Grasso
2. When the unit is in the field, it will have the surge protection
installed,
which will essentially limit any real life hipot voltages to about 500V
(230V
gas tube, 275VAC MOV). In real life, the unit would experience a maximum
500V
hipot. However, in the case of a single fault (surge
Hi Chris:
During safety testing at the lab, the unit passes HiPot
testing. However, the unit is broken by the testing.
Rigorously, the unit passes its type testing because
it doesn't become unsafe by the Hipot. However, it isn't
functional after the test; and it
The answer to this lies in the marketing information for the product. The
target End-Use-Environment drives the choice of standards. If this equipment
is being sold to residential users exclusively then it would not be scientific
equipment. This would rule out EN 61326 and the choice would then be
Chris,
I wasn't real clear on what was breaking during your hipot test. However,
these comments might help:
1) Be sure you are hipot testing with a DC test voltage. AC testing can
damage your Y capacitors. DC test voltage = peak of AC test voltage = 1.414
x AC test voltage.
2) If your product
For those interested, the latest proposal (dated 1 August) by the EC
commission for EuP can be found at
http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/lip/latest/doc/2003/com2003_0453en01
.doc
(copy this as a single line).
Regards,
Neil Helsby
All,
We have a product that runs from AC power.
During safety testing at the lab, the unit passes HiPot testing. However, the
unit is broken by the testing.
Rigorously, the unit passes its type testing because it doesn't become
unsafe by the Hipot. However, it isn't functional after the
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at:
From: richhug...@aol.com [mailto:richhug...@aol.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 2:29 AM
To: j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: Multiple postings re fuse replacement markings
Folks,
Apologies for bombarding you with the same Email. This was because AOL sent
me
Greetings:
Does anyone know if the Resolution Bandwidth
filter performance is tracable to a given standard
and which standard that might be?
I was wondering if the rool-off after the 3dB points
is specificed as a standard for ALL analysers.
I am assuming that the anaswer is Yes as chaos
would
Folks,
Apologies for bombarding you with the same Email. This was because AOL sent
me a message that my message couldn't be sent and so I re-tried. If its any
consolation, that means I got extra helpings of so-and-so is out of the
office messages.
Richard Hughes
I read in !emc-pstc that lfresea...@aol.com wrote (in
d.17866aa0.2c7ec...@aol.com) about 'Product standard for telescope' on
Wed, 27 Aug 2003:
We are trying to decide which EMC product standard may apply for
EMC. Would anyone care to share their opinions?
It's a scientific
I read in !emc-pstc that richhug...@aol.com wrote (in 130.2454e3f2.2c7e
9...@aol.com) about 'fuse replacement markings' on Wed, 27 Aug 2003:
There are plenty of fuse standards other than IEC 60127 and
unfortunately there is little or no commonality in marking
requirements between
I read in !emc-pstc that richhug...@aol.com wrote (in 174.1f945a94.2c7e
a...@aol.com) about 'fuse replacement markings' on Wed, 27 Aug 2003:
There are plenty of fuse standards other than IEC 60127 and
unfortunately there is little or no commonality in marking
requirements between
Hello All,
Thanks to everyone who answered regarding my question about comb filters.
Regards
Shaike Raz
EMC Laboratory Manager
EMC Laboratory
ITL (Product Testing) Ltd.
Kfar Bin Nun
Israel
Tel: +972-8-9797799
Fax: +972-8-9797702
Email: s...@itl.co.il
http://www.itl.co.il
In a message dated 8/27/2003 6:55:38 PM Central Daylight Time,
gary_mcintu...@msn.com writes:
Just a small heads up John.
I don't have the specs on the instruments that you are discussing but one
of the many things that the NIST folks want to know about your site are the
qualifications of
Hi All,
I'm chatting with a client that manufacturers high end telescopes. Not usually
found in Walmart, Currys etc. but they may find their way into richer family
homes. These chaps are great for observing Mars at the moment!
We are trying to decide which EMC product standard may apply for
John,
Regarding your comment:
Aren't you trying to conform to IEC 60950? If so, the code that I posted is
what is required. I am surprised that clause 1.7.6 is so vague, when the
corresponding clause in IEC 60065 is very explicit that the code specified in
IEC 60127 shall be used
There are
26 matches
Mail list logo