I would appreciate if someone could provide info of SAR/MPE requirement in
Mexico. I assume they don't have yet any mandatory requirement right now.
Thanks
Fang
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at: ht
A 100 MHz oscilloscope and a Pelligrini target would be good for viewing all
but the leading edge. With this one can look for runt pulses, correct current,
correct decay time, and missing pulses. The rise time is 3 ns and the cheapest
100 MHz TEK oscilloscope is around $1300. A 500 MHz oscilloscope
Major waste of time -- been through this a number of times with people
believing it would be a good idea to convert from time domain to frequency
domain when evaluating ESD simulators -- WG14 of the ESD Association did quite
a bit of work in this area and in the end, stick with the time domain
Helge,
Thank you. That is the exact information that I was looking for. I
spent four hours over three days trying to find this information on my
own before posting my request to this forum--including two inconclusive
rounds of E-mails with the *one* standards vendor that looked like they
*might*
I've often wondered...
Most people who have an ESD gun have a spectrum analyzer.
Most ESD guns have a multiple discharge setting.
What if you made a "coupling strip", such as a 12 inch long x 1 inch
wide piece of copper tape mounted on a board; then used two 970 Ohm
resistors to bond the stri
Sorry for the mistake in the URL. This one will work:
http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2004/c_098/c_09820040423en0008002
1.pdf
Vriendelijke Groeten, Meilleures salutations,
mit freundlichen Gruessen, Best regards,
Kristiaan Carpentier
Regulatory and Approval Engineer
This message i
You guys have to be all kinds of fun at a party.
Come on over, let me buy you a beer. :)
Mat Aschenberg
Agency Engineer II
EchoStar Technologies Corporation
Tel: 303-706-5064
Fax: 303-723-3901
Cell: 303-906-6224
Email: mat.aschenb...@echostar.com
Email Alternate: mat.aschenb...@ieee.org
From
Hello group,
A new list with HS for the EMC Directive has been published today in the OJ:
http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/nl/oj/dat/2004/c_098/c_09820040423en0008002
1.pdf
Vriendelijke Groeten, Meilleures salutations,
mit freundlichen Gruessen, Best regards,
Kristiaan Carpentier
Regulatory and
I read in !emc-pstc that Gordon,Ian wrote
(in ) about 'EN/IEC
61326 Harmonized Standard for Laboratory Equipment' on Fri, 23 Apr 2004:
>Whilst neither of the amendments referred to below affect the sort of
>equipment we produce or test it is "interesting" and not uncommon that there
>is a delay b
Gents
Whilst neither of the amendments referred to below affect the sort of
equipment we produce or test it is "interesting" and not uncommon that there
is a delay between the publication of the IEC version and the BS EN version.
I have always applied the BS EN version.
Am I correct in following
Hello John,
Addition of Annex E and F are new, there are no other differences.
*
Annex E (normative) Test configurations, operational conditions and
performance criteria for portable test, measuring and monitoring equipment
used in low-voltage distribution systems.
Annex F (normative) Te
11 matches
Mail list logo