NOM certification.

Hello NOM experts, Are products exempted from NOM (Mexican) requirements based on operating voltage? What is the exempted maximum voltage level? I wll appreciate all the information. Sudhakar Wasnik. SanDisk corp. swas...@sandisk.com T. 408

Re: India requirements

Hello, Dan, You can contact lingdon.day...@siemic.com for regulation of India approvals. Regards, Jeff Jin SIEMIC Inc. www.siemic.com SIEMIC InfoTech (China) Ltd. www.siemic.com.cn HCT-SIEMIC America, Inc. www.hctsiemic.com "Anchondo, Dan" wrote: Gentlemen What are the requirements

Job position - PCB Manager -Mountain View, CA

Compliance Folks We have a position for Printed Circuit Board Manager in Mountain View, California. This is a permanent position with company benifits. Position Description: Overall Job Description: A true hands-on technical manager with proven track record to perform Printed Circuit Board

Japanese emissions requirements near 5 GHz

Hello Mario, Thank you for your reply. Perhaps I asked the wrong question. We have an intentional radiator with a 10th harmonic of the oscillator that is less than 300 MHz, but the switch mode supply generates impulses measured in the 5 GHz region. We have been told that the product is "noisy

Fw: 60601-1 and patient leakage current

Here is an answer for the whole community. Best regards, Dave Osborn PM-CMS Philips Medical Systems PMS-158 3178 +1 978 659 3178 fax +1 978 685 5624 dave.osb...@philips.com

Re: FCC Part 18

Paul Lovell asked >>I understand that Part 18 applies to ISM products but what is its current status (ie active or waived)? Is it just EMC or does it cover other things? Please excuse my ignorance, I'm new to the medical field, but I'm told there are no FCC emissions requirements for medical dev

Re: 60601-1 and patient leakage current

>From personal experience, 0.1mA is wa-a-a-ay too high! Make it more like 10 uA - Robert - On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 18:03:19 +0100 gd...@ncht.trent.nhs.uk wrote: > With regard to whether Doug should be measuring Patient > Leakage from his > bedframe:- > > I believe the bedframe is a

RE: IEC 60950-1 2nd Ed

This is a multi-part message in MIME format. John, Thanks for this clarification. I strongly agree that the DC hipot provision should never be excluded. There are far too many products out there that simply cannot be tested otherwise. -Doug Doug Powell, Staff Engineer Corporate Compliance D

60601-1 and patient leakage current

With regard to whether Doug should be measuring Patient Leakage from his bedframe:- I believe the bedframe is an Applied Part under the definition of the general standard 60601-1; ("AP = a part of the equipment which in normal use .can be brought into contact with the patient ") ie: contac

Re: FCC Part 18

Paul, Medical equipment is exempted from Part 15, but certain medical equipment which intentionally uses RF (microwave equipment, ultrasound equipment, etc.) is subject to Part 18. HOWEVER, medical equipment in the US is subject to FDA regulations, and the FDA does have EMC requirements for med

Re: 60601-1 and patient leakage current

Doug, Have you checked out IEC 60601-2-38, Particular Requirements for the Safety of Electrically Operated Hospital Beds. This standard may clarify how you measure earth leakage current and patient leakage current for a hospital bed. (I don't have a copy of this standard, so I'm guessing). IEC

RE: 60601-1 and patient leakage current

Doug, 60601-1 is not the easiest standard to interpret, but I think that in this instance you are interpreting it incorrectly. Patient leakage current is that current which flows between an Applied Part and Earth via the patient. The accessible parts of the frame are not considered as Applied Part

RE: 60601-1 and patient leakage current

Doug, Altho I am not completely familiar with 60601-1 since I haven't worked with it for a number of years, I will comment on leakage current requirements for earthed equipment in general. By and large it is recognized that earth/ground is unreliable for cord connected equipment around

FCC Part 18

Paul Lovell Group Compliance Manager Huntleigh Healthcare Tel: +44 (0)1582 745891 Hi All, I understand that Part 18 applies to ISM products but what is its current status (ie active or waived)? Is it just EMC or does it cover other things? Please excuse my ignorance, I'm new to the medical fi

60601-1 and patient leakage current

Hi All, Question time again, this time concerning patient leakage current and permanently connected Class 1 equipment with a permanently connected earth. I have a product that exceeds the patient leakage current between the mains and the accessible metal parts of the frame (a motorised bed). The a

Re: IEC 60950-1 2nd Ed

Doug Beckwith wrote (in <2005103312.68191.qm...@web30508.mail.mud.yahoo.com>) about 'IEC 60950-1 2nd Ed', on Tue, 11 Oct 2005: >I just read an article on IEC 60950-1 2nd edition in Compliance >Engineering, and I was wondering if the standard has actually been >released. From the public p

Job Vacancy - Safety and Compliance Engineer - San Jose/Scotts Valley CA area

Xyratex International Inc. have a vacancy for a Product Safety and Compliance Engineer in the San Jose/Scotts Valley areas of California. The suitable candidate will oversee the Safety and EMC compliance of Xyratex's factory automation and test products, and cleaning systems developed at the San Jo

Antwort: VCCI testing above 1 GHz

Dear Don, as long as the technical requirements in V3-2005.04 are valid, you just need to perform measurements up to 1 GHz. In the actual Japanese standard it is referred to CISPR 22:1997. Kind regards i.V. Mario Lehmann Geschäftsbereich European Compliance Laboratory ___

IEC 60950-1 2nd Ed

Hi All, I just read an article on IEC 60950-1 2nd edition in Compliance Engineering, and I was wondering if the standard has actually been released. One one of the changes I read about was that DC Hipot testing is no longer allowed. Can anyone confirm that this requirement has changed in the ne