Hi Steve:
Here are the definitions for SELV and PELV
>from IEC 61335.
*
3.4.4
protective extra-low voltage circuit
earthed circuit operating at safety extra-low
voltage which is separated from other circuits
by basic insulation and protective screening,
double insulation or reinforc
Hi Scott,
The people on the EMC newsgroup were very helpful, I had quite a number
of responses. I would like to thank everyone who responded to me, I had
a number of replies offline of the newsgroup as well. We haven't
decided who to go with yet, the quote process is quite involved and we
have s
Hi Wayne,
So who did you decide you were going to go with? Just
curious. FYI - I am no longer with my former employer. I
am looking forward to taking something in Toronto area.
Best Regards,
Scott Drysdale
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering if I could get some recommendations and
> advice concer
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 10:15:44 -0400,
"UMBDENSTOCK, DON" wrote:
> Does anyone have specific METI/DENAN experience?
...
> This still seems like type approval to me.
> I do not see "100% of all production must be reported". Am I correct that a
> "type test" for the importer's record is sufficie
Hi Grace
There are other issues that may be involved but let’s address your specific
question.
Labs are not actually ‘registered’ with a Notified Body except under
annexes V and up. The intent of use for an NB proposed in your email is 1 -
to give credence to the test suite under annex III or 2
The alert mark is required if the frequency band is not harmonized in the EU.
Bill
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of John Woodgate
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 12:47 PM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: RTTE Conformity Assessment Procedure
In message
<2a93eb0
In message
<2a93eb060608091024h274cf040w98474b21dcc66...@mail.gmail.com>, dated
Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Grace Lin writes
>I don't understand the first paragraph of Annex III. My question is:
>do I need to have my lab (in a manufacturer) registed with one of
>notified bodies to be considered to be e
Dear Members,
Please help me to understand the conformity assessment procedure per the RTTE
Directive. Paragraph 4 of Article 10 of Directive 1999/5/EC states:
"Where a manufacturer has applied the harmonized standard referred to in
Article 5(1), radia equipment not within the scope of paragra
Does anyone have specific METI/DENAN experience?
The law
"Electrical Appliance and Material Safety Law
[ Law No.234 of 1961 / Tentative Translation ]"
http://www.jetro.go.jp/en/market/regulations/pdf/denan-2001nov-e.pdf
indicates that testing is required of all produ
Dave,
The ADCO document references the LVD 73/23 but many IT products are under the
RTTE where there no such wording like in the LVD Annex I, par. A1.
If a CD is needed to install the product (make it function), then there is an
obvious need to have a PC and you may well put the safety manual on t
Rich,
Thanks, good stuff. Now on to the followup...
What about safety documentation for IEC60950-1 products shipping to CB Scheme
countries (i.e. outside North America and the EU/RTTE)??
Does the safety information need to be printed, or is electronic copy
information sufficient? (the US &
Richard Nute wrote
>> Within the European Union:
"The safety warnings and safety instructions
needed to ensure that electrical equipment
will be used safely and for intended
applications shall be marked on the equipment.
If this is not possible the warnings and
instruc
12 matches
Mail list logo
