There have been several recommendations for California Instruments. I'll be
checking into what they have to offer.
Thanks to everyone who responded.
Regards,
Tim Pierce
In a message dated 10/21/2008 9:24:07 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk writes:
In message , da
We already had a California Instruments system to perform 61000-4-11. CI had a
package that could extend the capability to harmonic and flicker. When Agilent
abandoned us, we went to CI. We are please with the system.
Don Umbdenstock
Manager Compliance Engineering
Tyco Safety Products / Sens
I sent this on Monday but I do not think it got through to the group.
To Grace, and others who have replied,
Thank you. Your input is very much appreciated.
I did want a sanity check on my understanding of the regulatory requirements
and from the replies it seems I got those pretty much ri
A colleague has told me that they have found EM Test to be very user friendly.
I have had good experience with California Instruments equipment in the past as
well.
Not sure how either compares to the Agilent System mentioned though
Best regards,
Mac Elliott
[ X ] General Public
From
Hi Experts,
does anybody know if „additional” safety/EMC aspects for the import of an
“Airborne Missile Protection System for Helicopters in Iraq” are mandatory?
Or has anybody a contact to “experts” in Iraq (ministries, authorities,
…)? Our customer needs a obligatory answer.
Mit freun
EMC partner ?
Van: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] Namens John Woodgate
Verzonden: dinsdag 21 oktober 2008 18:18
Aan: emc-p...@ieee.org
Onderwerp: Re: Harmonic/Flicker Measurement Equipment
In message , dated Tue, 21 Oct 2008,
emcp...@aol.com writes:
>I would really like to find
Hi Mario
This has been a very long standing position from the FCC. It goes way back to
the 80’s when I first started dealing with the FCC. This very old policy
has been reiterated in the Knowledge Data Base (KDB). For example when
specifically asked the FCC responded in KDB460108 which states “
In message , dated Tue, 21 Oct 2008,
emcp...@aol.com writes:
>I would really like to find something similar to the HP/Agilent
>6842A Harmonic and Flicker Test System.
California Instruments?
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
Either we are causing globa
Hello,
I know I have previously asked a similar question before about equipment that
will test to the new harmonics and flicker standards effective in Feb. 2009,
but I would really like to find something similar to the HP/Agilent 6842A
Harmonic and Flicker Test System.
The Agilent unit has its
Bonjour,
I have seen some of these in the course of my visits to EMC laboratories and
one of the very good reason to have the door facing the antenna is that when
you will have to do the VNSA it will be much easier to align the antennas,
regardless of the way you actually perform your measureme
Mario, if you want the FCC reference for non-use of rods:
Part 15.31(a)(3) calls out ANSI C63.4-2003 as a test method and C63.4
allows rod antenna measurements under 30 MHz. But 15.31(a)(3) also excludes
paragraph 4.1.5.2 of C63.4 from being used which specifies the electric
field measurements und
The list of standards used by the FCC for measurements may be found at
http://www.fcc.gov/oet/ea/eameasurements.html
They are not consistent in using a loop antenna. For Access Broadband (in
Part 15) the Commission uses loop antennas below 30 MHz (see
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attac
Dear Members,
I´ve heard that FCC will not accept rod antenna measurements below 30 MHz.
This was´nt puplished anywhere in the rules.
May I ask you to help finding a source on the FCC web site to get such
important informations in the future?
Kind regards
Mario Lehmann
Geschäftsbereich
13 matches
Mail list logo
