All too true. That GPO web site is the best source.
Ghery S. Pettit
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Dennis Ward
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 10:23 AM
To: 'John Woodgate'; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: 47 CFR
Actually, for 47CFR by the time they reach hard
Actually, for 47CFR by the time they reach hard copy they are already out of
date.
Dennis Ward
Director of Engineering
American TCB
Certification Resource for the Wireless Industry www.atcb.com
703-847-4700 fax 703-847-6888
direct - 703-880-4841
From: emc-p...@ieee.org
In message
4c5e6457cd7911469a07260381288c2861c63...@orsmsx502.amr.corp.intel.com,
dated Mon, 12 Apr 2010, Pettit, Ghery ghery.pet...@intel.com writes:
Those are so old that they aren't really good for much.
A 'standards year' is about 0.1 calendar year?
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try
Those are so old that they aren't really good for much.
Ghery S. Pettit
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Brian O'Connell
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 7:19 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: 47 CFR
Hello Grace,
Perhaps you could donate to a local school or
I’ve also heard (in a public forum) from the head of medical device
conformity at UL-USA that there is a push to keep the 2nd edition of 60601-1
viable until the 60601-1:2006’s Amendment 1 comes out, in 2012, and into
force around 2014. This would also allow time for all -2-xx Standards to be
Hi Kim,
CENELEC/TC 62 has decided that, with the publication of EN 60601-1:2006,
compliance with EN 60601-1:1990 and its related collateral standards will no
longer give ‘presumption of conformity’ with the European directives
covered as of 1 June 2012. Publication in the Official Journal of
Hi all
EN 60601-1: 2006 should have been implemented now. The date is not indicated
on the Official lists but I have been informed last year that it should be
used from ¼ 2010.
I have just been informed that some NB’s will not use it, and I can’t
still see any date in the official lists.
7 matches
Mail list logo
