In message
,
dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012, "Kim, Ben" writes:
What if it conflicts with upcoming LVD Directive ?
Then it applies only in Germany to German-made products.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh,
Are there requirements on the size of the label and if it must be
visible on the outside of the product? Can it be behind an access
door?
On 2/28/12, John Woodgate wrote:
> In message
> <72b8947772cf0948adaa9853631663fb6477498...@pbi-namsg-02.mgdpbi.global.pv
> t>, dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Jim Hu
What if it conflicts with upcoming LVD Directive ? The EU LVD/EMC directives
are currently under revision as part of alignment with new NLF Directive,
and placing those importer contact information in a document will be one of the
allowed options once the proposal is passed by EU Council (highly
In message
<72b8947772cf0948adaa9853631663fb6477498...@pbi-namsg-02.mgdpbi.global.pv
t>, dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Jim Hulbert writes:
Under the new German Product Safety Act (ProdSG), as of Dec 2011
consumer products are required to have a label with the name and
address of the manufacturer (o
Hi Scott,
Not sure if this answers your question, but you MUST use a Notified Body if
you test to a standard that has not been harmonized as evidenced by being
published in the Official Journal of the EU.
If you do test to a standard that is indeed harmonized and published in the
OJ, then y
Jim,
I send my answer tomorrow.
Best regards
Dipl.-Ing. Michael Loerzer
Managing Director
Regulatory Affairs Specialist
Das neue Buch zum Thema "Product Compliance":
http://www.beuth.de/de/artikel/produktkonformitaet (Produktkonformität,
Prozesse, Risikomanagement, CE-Kennze
Hi,
for a regulatory compliance project we are looking for a Japanese
Consultant (native speaker) which is familiar with Japanese ESH/HSE
requirements and regulatory machine safety requirements. You can contact me
offline.
Best regards
Dipl.-Ing. Michael Loerzer
Managing Director
Regu
On 28 Feb 2012, at 17:11, Amund Westin wrote:
> My input on this issue:
>
> · Notified Body = Appointed by authorities for testing /
> certification according to an EU directive
> · Accredited laboratory = Fulfil ISO/IEC 17025 Laboratory
> Accreditation (criteria for laborator
Seems to me that it depends on the type of power supply in the equipment.
Just about everything these days uses a switching power supply. Given
that, the next question is whether it is harmonic/power factor corrected
or not.
If not, and the input to the power supply is simply a bridge rectifie
My input on this issue:
. Notified Body = Appointed by authorities for testing /
certification according to an EU directive
. Accredited laboratory = Fulfil ISO/IEC 17025 Laboratory
Accreditation (criteria for laboratories to demonstrate the technical
competence to carry out sp
No we can't. It's not a modified SINE wave; that's just salesmanship,
Ed. It's more like 50% duty cycle bipolar pulses.
The far from technical Mr. Barney (AKA Google[tm]) leads me to
http://www.rvtechlibrary.com/electrical/sinewave.htm:
quote:
... Desktop computers are not in the same categ
Hello Amund.
No, there's no requirement for a Notified Body to be associated with a test
laboratory.
Presently, there's no requirement for a Notified Body to be accredited under
the R&TTE Directive.. Although each nation typically does have an
accreditation requirement before submitting Not
I have a personal question about the ruggedness of consumer entertainment
equipment to powerline distortion, and I would like to hear any thoughts you
might have about this.
The potential victims are 120 VAC powered televisions, radios, disk players,
computers, etc. The environment is a recreat
The original 2010 proposals were to include the R&TTE in the NLF as a
re-cast directive. I cannot find any recent activity on this. Any
information if NLF will affect acceptance of these self-generated reports?
Brian
-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On
Scott
Also - as a manufacturer, there is nothing to stop you performing your own
tests - there is no mandatory requirement to use an accredited lab.
If you're not using an accredited Lab and need a Notified Body opinion - talk
to them first about how you will demonstrate suitable competence and
If the tests are all done to a harmonised standard (standard fully applied,
and passes), then there's no need to go to a Notified Body.
(You can, if you wish to, but there's no need to)
If you can't or don't fully apply a harmonised standard, then you must go to
a Notified Body for their opini
Hi Steve,
If it's a GPS Receiver that is also located with (for example) a Bluetooth
transmitter, then you could still assess the Bluetooth transmitter to EN 300
328 and EN 301 489-17, then the GPS receiver to EN 300 440 and EN 301 489-3.
The comment in TGN 16 comes from the type of GPS equ
> I notice that some compliance reports of R&TTE are reviewed by a notified body
> while some are issued by an accredited laboratory only. Can someone advise if
> they have different purposes or requirements.
>
> Thanks and regards,
>
> Scott
-
-
Michael,
After reviewing the TGN16 a little closer, I noticed the statement
below:
This Guidance applies to receive-only equipment. Where GPS/GNSS or
other
receivers are combined with other radio equipment, different principles
may apply.
So, back to my question regarding multi-radio
All,
Thanks for the replies which have been consistent across the board
recommending EN 301 489-3 for the EMC portion. This is what I was
leaning toward as well, even without the knowledge of TGN16 but based
mostly on the scopes of all parts in the EN 301 489 series of standards.
As an option
Hello Steve,
It's not a broadcast receiver and therefore the R&TTE Directive does apply.
I've seen people use all sorts of standards in the past but the basic
requirement is really going to be to check the receiver emissions (article
3.2 of the Directive) and also check it has good EMC perf
Steve
GPS receivers are covered by R&TTE Directive as they are "non-broadcast"
receive only equipment - have a look at R&TTE Compliance Association Guidance
Note on this:
http://www.rtteca.com/TGN16.pdf
The most suitable standards are EN 301 489-3 for EMC and EN 300 440-2 for RF
Spectrum.
Reg
All,
I would be interested in all opinions regarding the compliance
requirements for a GPS receiver. Annex I, Item 4 excludes all sound and
TV broadcast receivers from the R&TTE Directive.
Assuming the R&TTE Directive applies, which one of the Product Specific
Standards would be most ap
23 matches
Mail list logo
