To keep people from stealing the bulbs?
Heh.
Wikipedia says 110 or 120 V are used for traction on a couple of lines,
most higher, some MUCH higher. Perhaps I'd have learned more if I'd
gotten the job at Kawasaki's New York railcar facility.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Railway_electrification
I think Ken is on the right track. Railroad signally and portable equipment
both represent areas where there is a higher risk of exposed connections.
Receiving a shock from 110V is unpleasant, but it is less likely to lead to
significant harm than a 240 V shock. I've contacted 110V a number of t
It's safer! :-P :-D
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Scott Xe wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> Is there any particular reasons to have 110 Vac for railway signalling
> system in a 230/240 Vac country?
>
> Scott
>
>
> On 4/7/12 3:10 PM, "Andrew McCallum"
> wrote:
>
> > The UK railway signalling system all
Hi Andy,
Is there any particular reasons to have 110 Vac for railway signalling
system in a 230/240 Vac country?
Scott
On 4/7/12 3:10 PM, "Andrew McCallum" wrote:
> The UK railway signalling system all runs at 110 V AC 50 HZ
> Andy
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Woodgate [mailto
The UK railway signalling system all runs at 110 V AC 50 HZ
Andy
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: 03 July 2012 21:17
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: Interview Questions
In message
,
dated Tue, 3 Jul 2012, IBM Ken writes:
>PS: Who o
5 matches
Mail list logo