In message
4b64c938bf60be46b83b25988b0a7d7407c66...@sushdc8000.td.teradata.com,
dated Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Knighten, Jim L jim.knigh...@teradata.com
writes:
2) Comply with the absolute limits given in IEC 61000-3-2:2011, Table
1,
The published document differs from the approved draft in that
Have to check out this claim:
RoHS, REACH and WEEE are not included in the CE mark regime. That's because
they are not New approach directives.
Corrcet?
#Amund
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
Not quite answering the question, but RoHS is included in CE marking from
Jan 2013, the recast directive , so called RoHS 2.
John C
-Original Message-
From: amund [mailto:am...@westin-emission.no]
Sent: 11 October 2012 12:14
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Part of CE
Indeed, except RoHS2 that will be included in the NLF, thus part of CE marking
and will be in force starting from Jan. 2013 replacing RoHS.
Best regards,
Kris Carpentier
-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of amund
Sent: donderdag 11 oktober
Group,
Does anyone have experience with the AAMI version of 60601-1, 3rd edition
and clause 7.4.3? This clause requires that measurement parameters be in
SI units. I'm working on a therapeutic exercise device which requires
patients to enter weight as a step in the setup process. American
In message
canckvwje-kae8vnbgtf3ddgi-y8xfma-ubwnqtzxa9e0pyv...@mail.gmail.com,
dated Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Carl Newton emcl...@gmail.com writes:
American patients will be befuddled if required to enter kg.
So would many British patients!
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
The
Hello from overcast Northern California.
I recently purchased a copy of HD 361 to decode HAR cable designations.
An example is:
H05GG-F
H = harmonized cable
05 = 300/500 V
G = ethylene vinyl acetate conductor insulation
G = ethylene vinyl acetate jacket
F = flexible conductors (Class 5)
My
HI Folks,
I'm looking for a source of either very fine braid, or even foil that I can use
to make up a set of shielded cables. The typical braid has much too poor
optical coverage. I'm envisaging most likely using 2 layers. cabels are less
than 1/2 diameter.
Suggestions appreciated.
Hi Peter,
Regarding the voltage ratings, according to a handwritten note I made on a
printout from Oflex on my cube wall, the first number refers to the conductor
to ground voltage rating and the second number refers to the conductor to
conductor voltage rating for multiconductor cable. I
I did find a reference to this, though not from an official source:
http://www.muellergroup.net/faq.html#10
Scott Aldous
Compliance Engineer
AE Solar Energy
+1.970.492.2065 Direct
+1.970.407.5872 Fax
+1.541.312.3832 Main
scott.ald...@aei.com
1625 Sharp Point Drive
Fort Collins, CO 80525
Scott is correct that the first number is the conductor to ground rating and
the second is the conductor to conductor rating. Here is the information on the
voltage rating from Lapp Group.
Thank you, Aldous. That's almost logical.
That type of information really ought to be in HD 361, but it isn't.
There is a Table 4 in HD 361 that shows how to read cable designations and
confirms the inside to outside arrangement of the cable properties, but
nothing on reading the voltage.
In message 28d487da62d23a9968517e8f0003d...@mail.gmail.com, dated Thu,
11 Oct 2012, Peter Tarver ptar...@enphaseenergy.com writes:
Does the same inside to outside approach also apply to the voltage
rating, as I expect that it does?
Isn't that specified in HD 361?
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only.
In message 8cf75dc01b80d7b-14cc-23...@webmail-stg-d14.sysops.aol.com,
dated Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Derek Walton lfresea...@aol.com writes:
I'm looking for a source of either very fine braid, or even foil that I
can use to make up a set of shielded cables. The typical braid has much
too poor
I know I'm wading into a sea of troubles by commenting, but here is my opinion.
(And yes, it is just an opinion.)
Twist-on wire connectors have become ubiquitous in North America. (I believe
that Wire Nut is a registered trademark of one of the suppliers.) They end up
in everybody's toolbox
Carl,
What if it is addressed in your RMF? Considering it is ANSI/AAMI instead of
IEC/EN, and the intended market, I would think this would be an area you could
use the RMF and address it that way. If needed you could possible address this
using Clause 4.5 (although, this might be a bit of a
Derek,
You might check EN 61508 and whatever ISO standard is referenced for Risk
Assessment. My guess is it will depend on the risk and the severity of that
risk that you are trying to avoid.
Regards,
Josh
Joshua Wiseman
Taylor Company
A division of Carrier Commercial Refrigeration, Inc
Ferrules might present an equally interesting topic for discussion.
Kaz Gawrzyjal
-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Ted Eckert
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 11:07 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: What's the deal with Wire
You might try Tech Flex.
http://www.techflex.com/land_metal.asp
Chuck McDowell
Meyer Sound Laboratories Inc.
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Derek Walton
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 8:27 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Shielding materials
HI Folks,
I'm
The data must be able to be displayed in SI units but it does not prohibit the
equipment to display other units of measure. At least that is my understanding
of this requirement.
Regards,
Nick Momcilovic
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Carl Newton
Sent:
Here¹s a lightweight approach. Haven¹t looked at how fine the braid wire is,
but maybe this will work for you.
http://www.araconfiber.com/WhyARACON.html
Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261
From: Derek Walton lfresea...@aol.com
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:27:06 -0400 (EDT)
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
You could also take a look at EN 1088:1995+A2:2008 Safety of machinery -
Interlocking devices associated with guards - Principles for design and
selection (Harmonised) and EN1050 - the basic machinery risk assessment
standard (not a lot of use, but it might help)
This might also help:
Ted,
If the rewiring or wire splicing is done on a product wouldn't this simply
be a foreseeable misuse of the product? Product modifications are usually
stated as a no-no in the user manual and there are many other methods to misuse
a product including the use of wire nuts, ferrules,
I've worked with plenty of products where wire nuts were the intended
connection method. I've purchased fluorescent light fixtures that include wire
nuts in the package for the installer to use. The wire nuts are not necessarily
used for product modifications; they can be for their intended
24 matches
Mail list logo
