Then you are correct lvd is exempt for the dc unit but covered by the GPSD
Sent from my iPhone
Peter S. Merguerian
pe...@goglobalcompliance.com
Go Global Compliance Inc.
www.goglobalcompliance.com
(408) 931-3303
On May 15, 2013, at 3:23 PM, "Brian Oconnell" wrote:
> The D of C and a directive'
The D of C and a directive's scope are, much to my chagrin, actually two
different issues. I was addressing only the latter.
The D of C coverage simply reflects the risk that the supplier wants to
assume. Basis for presumption of conformity? -> Whatever the signatory wants
to defend.
Brian
-
Why deal with two DoCs; one for the power supply (lvd/Emc/rohs) and one for the
device (Emc/rohs)? You can declare system (device + external power supply)
under one DoC (lvd/Emc/rohs)
Sent from my iPhone
Peter S. Merguerian
pe...@goglobalcompliance.com
Go Global Compliance Inc.
www.goglobalcomp
As you have stated, an external power supply that can be considered an
end-use item is within the scope of the LVD if intended to connect to AC
mains.
An external DC/DC converter power supply that can be considered an end-use
item is not scoped by the LVD, where the input and/or output is not with
Carl,
It could maybe, but it would also need to be considered and covered by EMC and
RoHS directives.
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Carl Newton
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 12:01 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Cc: emcl...@gmail.com
Subject: Revisit Old LVD
I'm opening a very old question here, but I'd like to hear some list member
current views concerning the applicability of the LVD to devices that
utilize external wall-wort and brick power supplies.
In this example, an external brick AC/DC power supply is shipped with a
device with in input r
6 matches
Mail list logo
