This is a question for the safety testing engineers.
We have products that contain 12V/24V DC cooling fans that cool either the PSU
or processing circuits.
The fan speeds are reduced with basically a series resistor to reduce audio
noise.
The safety testing agency demands to know the exact
In message
80f690de07894e049b221728b4a99...@dbxpr07mb206.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
, dated Fri, 13 Dec 2013, McBurney, Ian ian.mcbur...@allen-heath.com
writes:
We have to use alternative fans due to supply issues and this incurs
considerable test agency costs as the agency won?t accept a
John;
I believe the fans are listed for the flammability of the plastic body but I
may be wrong.
Ian McBurney
Design Compliance Engineer.
Allen Heath Ltd.
Kernick Industrial Estate,
Penryn, Cornwall. TR10 9LU. UK
T: 01326 372070
E: ian.mcbur...@allen-heath.com
-Original Message-
In message
ed08bb5be2d841e0a1b0ca499f924...@dbxpr07mb206.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
, dated Fri, 13 Dec 2013, McBurney, Ian ian.mcbur...@allen-heath.com
writes:
I believe the fans are listed for the flammability of the plastic body
but I may be wrong.
It would surely be worthwhile to check
Hi Ian,
The last company I was with used to specify a single manufacturer's fan in the
UL report including supply voltage / current / CFM) and then (with UL's
agreement) include the words or any recognised equivalent component.
During the factory inspections, if a fan was being fitted from a
Ian
I think the critical factor may be the airflow rates at the reduced voltages
as this may well vary between various ostensibly similar fans of the same
nominal voltage.
The actual airflow patterns from the outputs of the various fans may also
differ due to differing blade profiles, etc.
John;
I agree the airflow rates will vary with applied voltage and blade profile but
if the product continues to function safely with a stalled rotor why does it
have to be listed in the critical component list.
Regards;
Ian McBurney
Design Compliance Engineer.
Allen Heath Ltd.
Kernick
Ian
That's a very good question!
The only other things that I can currently think of are:
- The agency does not (want to?) accept the UL Recognition (not Listing, I
suspect) for business political reasons because UL is a competitor (and
AFAIK, there is no compelling legal reason why they have
In message
ff0018ae2af54a2b95bfa760f8747...@dbxpr07mb206.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
, dated Fri, 13 Dec 2013, McBurney, Ian ian.mcbur...@allen-heath.com
writes:
but if the product continues to function safely with a stalled rotor
why does it have to be listed in the critical component list.
John;
I have often asked for the reasoning to many similar problems and get directed
to an ambiguous clause in the standard that I read one way and the agency reads
the other way and because there is no independent arbiter I end up acquiescing
as the whole process slows down and I am on a
A locked rotor test is considered an abnormal and measured temperatures are
allowed to exceed the limits for normal operation. If that happens, then it
proves a minimal amount of airflow is required to maintain safe temperatures
and minimal CFMs become required.
That said, I've never seen a
In message
c8225bb6612e4cf382ba4b073e71d...@dbxpr07mb206.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
, dated Fri, 13 Dec 2013, McBurney, Ian ian.mcbur...@allen-heath.com
writes:
I have often asked for the reasoning to many similar problems and get
directed to an ambiguous clause in the standard that I read one
Agreed on both counts!
John Allen
Sent from my Fonepad
"Brown,William" wrote:>A locked rotor test is considered an abnormal and measured temperatures are allowed to exceed the limits for normal operation. If that happens, then it proves a minimal amount of airflow is
Additionally, most agencies have a process to repeal or elevate a decision
beyond the engineer that you are directly working with.
Josh
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 8:53 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject:
Will is correct. I have gotten around this type of fan issue in the past by
simply running the normal heating test with the fan disconnected. If you can
pass normal temperature rise limits without the fan then your argument becomes
easier as the fan is no longer critical, it is simply a
Ian
It doesn't function safely with the stalled rotor, it functions not
dangerously. In fact the standard doesn't really care whether it functions,
just whether it's unsafe.
Do you need the fans to meet maximum temperature limits in normal operation, or
just to lower temperatures and prolong
Article 14 of the new WEEE Directive requires manufacturers to provide
information to product users on the process and benefits of dealing with WEEE
in accordance with the Directive (as opposed to just thowing it away with other
household waste).
This requirement is not new - it was
Ian -
Another consideration, since you have more than one fan, is that you can
disable *all* fans simultaneously to demonstrate that no cooling is
necessary for safety reasons. This is a multiple fault scenario, but it's
at your discretion to do so to prove your case and eliminates the need for
Hi Group,
I am a bit confused about what standard may apply for DC powered Boat Motor. I
am being told that EN55012 applies. I am not convinced. Thoughts?
Thank you ,
Mark Schmidt
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety
Hi Mark,
One more clarification please. Is this for a Toy Boat, either remote
controlled or otherwise? Or is it something like a tolling motor for a real
boat?
thanks, –doug
Douglas E Powell
doug...@gmail.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dougp01
From: Mark Schmidt
Sent: Friday, December
In message 119fa9545c6e264b830c4582886d11908871b...@quimby.dw.local,
dated Fri, 13 Dec 2013, Mark Schmidt mark.schm...@dornerworks.com
writes:
I am a bit confused about what standard may apply for DC powered Boat
Motor. I am being told that EN55012 applies. I am not convinced.
Thoughts
Fellow Product safety professionals,
I have a product with harmonized tariff code
8504.50.4000http://hts.usitc.gov/Table%2085.xml#8504.50.4000, I need to find
out what regulations [EMC/product safety/restricted material/testing/product
registration/etc.] that may apply to this product for
I am not testing the boat just the motor. Other things is defined by combustion
engines only that can be used in residential areas not DC electrical motors.
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 1:30 PM
To:
Hello Ian:
The first question is whether or not the fan is necessary
to meet the temperature requirements of the standard.
If yes, then the fan and its alternates must be tested to
prove that the end-product meets the temperature requirements.
A UL-certified fan should reduce the testing
In message 119fa9545c6e264b830c4582886d11908871b...@quimby.dw.local,
dated Fri, 13 Dec 2013, Mark Schmidt mark.schm...@dornerworks.com
writes:
I am not testing the boat just the motor. Other things is defined by
combustion engines only that can be used in residential areas not DC
electrical
1. My employer also makes 'ganged' chargers, and this is not the HTC that my
customer used. See if the ITC can advise on your HT code.
2. Japan, Korea, and Taiwan have their national versions of 60950 and CISPR.
3. Talk to the International Approvals office of your friendly neighborhood
one-stop
26 matches
Mail list logo