PSNet colleagues,
It is quite clear that Japan is adopting international standards for
safety of machinery.
What is not clear is the current implementation requirements in this
process.
A client is receiving general input from a Japanese customer that
additional work
Hello all,
As we've been talking about the R&TTE Class 1 and 2 devices, the lists have
been updated:
http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/rtte/documents/index_en.htm#h2-5
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
Certification Resource for the Wireless Indu
Richard,
This depends on what type of equipment the end product is. There are
regulations being drafted by the EPA as we speak. Some types of equipment have
extensions being granted while other types are expected to have a ban on R134a,
possibly as soon as Jan 1, 2016. Another consideration
We have several products that contain closed /sealed cooling systems with Freon
134a in them? [There are not field serviceable units.]
What product take back regulations would apply to this kind of product in
Canada and US?
This is a new type of product for me. Any assistance is welcome.
Best R
Hi John,
Appreciate your further advice on the compliance with LV Direcitve. You are
right although the principle is the same, there are a number places in
differences. I will read it again.
Best regards.
Scott
On 3 Aug, 2014, at 8:43 pm, John Woodgate wrote:
> In message , dated Sat, 2
Good Monday morning all,Does anyone know of an accredited calibration house with capability for doing high current probe calibrations on the order of AC current of 1000-2000 Amps and DC Current of 1000-2000 amps?The AC probe is a Rogowski type and the DC probe is LEM. I could do factory cals but
In message <059401cfafcf$482689d0$d8739d70$@acbcert.com>, dated Mon, 4
Aug 2014, Michael Derby writes:
So, I'm not sure if there are mixed messages about whether it is just
for customs and MSAs, or if it's for the user also?
I've seen an official document that states the case, but I can't
r
5725-5845MHz is not required alert sign.
For 2.G, alert sign is no longer required since July,1 2012 for EU members,
before June 30 2012, alert sign was required as in France 2.4G is restricted
and not harmonized.
Regards
Tim
发件人: Michael Derby [micha..
Thanks John.
So, the 'charged battery' issue is to allow market surveillance and customs to
power it on?
Don't forget that the Alert Symbol was intended to alert the user to a
restriction and I don't recall much information to the public about that. :-)
(I guess that's why it's being removed
HI Paul,
Good point…. Disclaimer, I only had my R&TTE hat on. J
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: Paul Lovell (plovell) [mailto:plov...@cisco.com]
Sent: 04 August 2014 11:20
To: Michael Derby; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] E-Labe
In message <052201cfafc6$8f2907d0$ad7b1770$@acbcert.com>, dated Mon, 4
Aug 2014, Michael Derby writes:
There is a suggestion that devices with an integral screen which use an
electronic CE Mark but are not supplied with charged batteries may
require a ‘peel off’ temporary label with a CE Mark
Hi Michael,
FYI, e-labelling is already permitted in the medical devices area and is
covered by Regulation 207/2012. Permission is limited and anything ending up
with a patient has to be provided with paper, but this might give an idea of
how it might develop for ITE, especially with internet
Hi Mike,
Electronic labelling has always been unpopular with some of the European market
surveillance groups and therefore considered forbidden. To the point that the
industry was given the impression that electronic CE Marking would never happen
in Europe.
It seems that the European Comm
13 matches
Mail list logo
