[PSES] FW: [PSES] EN 62133 2013

2016-04-27 Thread John Woodgate
With best wishes OOO – Own Opinions Only www.jmwa.demon.co.uk J M Woodgate and Associates Rayleigh England From: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 5:50 PM To: 'Scott Xe' Subject: RE: [PSES] EN

Re: [PSES] EN 62133 2013

2016-04-27 Thread Larkin, Matthew
From: Larkin, Matthew Sent: ‎27/‎04/‎2016 15:09 To: Scott Xe; Leber, Jody (Suwanee); EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE: [PSES] EN

Re: [PSES] EN 62133 2013

2016-04-27 Thread Larkin, Matthew
Hi Scott In relation to EN60950-1 & EN 60065 Annex ZA details normative referenced standards such as EN62133 and how to determine the revision to utilise. If using a Harmonised standard to assist the demonstration of conformity to a EU Directive the OJ should be used to determined if it is

Re: [PSES] EN 62133 2013

2016-04-27 Thread Scott Xe
Scott & Matt, Thanks for your information. Should we consider in this way that for product scope in EN 60065 or 60950-1, the effective date should follow the publication in OJEU and for batteries, DOW of 10/01/2016 is applied as per standard stated. Currently EN 62133 is not included in LVD or

Re: [PSES] EN 62133 2013

2016-04-27 Thread Scott Aldous
See the last paragraph of the Austrian National Foreword in this preview . I didn't see a similar note in other country national forewards that I could find. On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at

Re: [PSES] EN 62133 2013

2016-04-27 Thread Scott Xe
> > Hi Matt, > > > > Where did you get dow of 10/01/2016? > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > Scott > > > > Sent from Mail for > Windows 10 > > > > *From:* Larkin, Matthew [mailto:matthew.lar...@tuv-sud.co.uk] > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 26, 2016 1:54