[PSES] Server Magnetic Field Susceptibility

You might find these several videos interesting in that they show a very large Neodymium magnet (undefined field strength) being exposed to three commercial servers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4l-6qWaZpVQ Shipping and handling issues related to the magnet:

Re: [PSES] Fwd: ESD, part of our training Enjoy!

Courtland, Or like when my boss said he had never seen anything effected by the VCP in an ESD test and I showed him how it knocked out my USB mouse at 8KV contact to VCP every 5th hit or so. From over 10 feet away. My laptop didn't last much longer either, I'm wondering if it is connected to

Re: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] Re: [PSES] Fwd: ESD, part of our training Enjoy!

At least you were annoying somebody else. I was demonstrating, from a personnel safety standpoint, the need for the bleeder resistors and the ESD bench insulator. Charged the horizontal plate up to about 30K (good old Andy Hish ESD gun) and was pushing back the insulator. I accidentally came

Re: [PSES] Fwd: ESD, part of our training Enjoy!

How many did you terminate with ozone ? With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO – Own Opinions Only www.jmwa.demon.co.uk J M Woodgate and Associates Rayleigh England Sylvae in aeternum manent. -Original Message- From: Cortland Richmond [mailto:k...@earthlink.net] Sent: Thursday, November

Re: [PSES] Fwd: ESD, part of our training Enjoy!

On 11/1/2016 8:53 AM, N. Shani wrote: Well, I don't know if he's an idiot or a fool: About 30 years ago, we got a brand-new ESD test gun at Wang Laboratories in Massachusetts, and I found it necessary to prove that the simulator delivered a similar waveform as a human. I got to be the

Re: [PSES] Fwd: ESD, part of our training Enjoy!

On 11/1/2016 8:53 AM, N. Shani wrote: a fool, on the other hand, know what to expect, but still goes and does his/her action/s PS: I hope he was well paid. Cortland - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering

Re: [PSES] ETSI EN 302 195 V2.1.1

Peter RED may be used now, but so can R for equipment that is within scope of RED. The key article is Article 48 Transitional provisions Member States shall not impede, for the aspects covered by this Directive, the making available on the market or putting into service of radio equipment

Re: [PSES] ETSI EN 302 195 V2.1.1

Charlie – Article 49 Transposition 1. Member States shall adopt and publish, by 12 June 2016, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive. They shall forthwith communicate the text of those measures to the Commission. They shall apply those

[PSES] Receiver Blocking or Desensitization Test per ETSI EN Standards

Dear Members, Have you had experience in *receiver blocking or desensitization test* per ETSI EN standards? It seems this test is required for all receiver categories per ETSI EN 302 195. For ETSI EN 300 330, receiver blocking or desensitization test applies to receiver category 1 and 2 only.

Re: [PSES] ETSI EN 302 195 V2.1.1

On 11/3/2016 3:36 AM, John Woodgate wrote: I think ETSI is justified in resisting the Commission's bid to insist that 'a standard is only harmonized if we say so'. *Someone* has missed the astounding concept that "harmony" and "harmonize" are English words ANYONE can use. And that one should

Re: [PSES] ETSI EN 302 195 V2.1.1

See my previous post about 'hi-jacking'. I think ETSI is justified in resisting the Commission's bid to insist that 'a standard is only harmonized if we say so'. With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO – Own Opinions Only www.jmwa.demon.co.uk J M Woodgate and

Re: [PSES] ETSI EN 302 195 V2.1.1

>Harmonised Standard covering the essential requirements of article 3.2 of the >Directive 2014/53/EU This phrase can mean only one thing: meant to be used as a Harmonized standard in the sense of the directive as OJ publication. ETSI should have written : "Intended to be harmonized….", as it