Bostjan;
That is my understanding; use the table to determine the cross-sectional
area (as wire) required, and then ensure that the stud&nut
arrangement provides at least triple that contact area.
-Ken
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:33 PM, Boštjan Glavič
wrote:
> Hi Ken,
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> So on
Hi Ken,
Thanks.
So on short, if table 3B brings requirement of 50mm2 conductor, you would
accept terminal if it brings contact area of 150mm2?
Best regards,
Bostjan
From: IBM Ken [mailto:ibm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2016 5:24 AM
To: Boštjan Glavič
Cc: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.
Hi Bostjan!
Can note (c) in Table 3E be applied to this product?
I think it is justifiable to extend the protective bonding rules to the PE
connection; i.e. to pass the bonding test or to verify via inspection that
the PE conductor is "not smaller" than the mains supply - but that's just
my opinio
Dear experts
I hope there are some experts dealing with IEC 60950-1 standard. We have a
product that has rated input current 130A. Unit is intended for permanent
connection to mains and provide special terminals for 3 phases and bolt with
stud for PE connectio.
Question is how should we evalua
4 matches
Mail list logo