Re: [PSES] dimension of the stud for PE

2016-11-30 Thread IBM Ken
Bostjan; That is my understanding; use the table to determine the cross-sectional area (as wire) required, and then ensure that the stud&nut arrangement provides at least triple that contact area. -Ken On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:33 PM, Boštjan Glavič wrote: > Hi Ken, > > > > Thanks. > > So on

Re: [PSES] dimension of the stud for PE

2016-11-30 Thread Boštjan Glavič
Hi Ken, Thanks. So on short, if table 3B brings requirement of 50mm2 conductor, you would accept terminal if it brings contact area of 150mm2? Best regards, Bostjan From: IBM Ken [mailto:ibm...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2016 5:24 AM To: Boštjan Glavič Cc: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.

Re: [PSES] dimension of the stud for PE

2016-11-30 Thread IBM Ken
Hi Bostjan! Can note (c) in Table 3E be applied to this product? I think it is justifiable to extend the protective bonding rules to the PE connection; i.e. to pass the bonding test or to verify via inspection that the PE conductor is "not smaller" than the mains supply - but that's just my opinio

[PSES] dimension of the stud for PE

2016-11-30 Thread Boštjan Glavič
Dear experts I hope there are some experts dealing with IEC 60950-1 standard. We have a product that has rated input current 130A. Unit is intended for permanent connection to mains and provide special terminals for 3 phases and bolt with stud for PE connectio. Question is how should we evalua