Re: [PSES] Voltage Rating vs Voltage Specification

2017-04-10 Thread Ralph McDiarmid
An example given in IEC 61283: 3/N/PE 400/230V 50Hz or . . . 3/N/PE 400/230V 50Hz Use of international symbols from IEC 417 is also mentioned. Ralph McDiarmid Product Compliance Engineering Solar Business Schneider Electric -Original Message- From: Brian O'Connell

Re: [PSES] Voltage Rating vs Voltage Specification

2017-04-10 Thread Brian O'Connell
There are other meanings for this type of notation; typically three-phase stuff. See IEC60038 where scope is not a component power supply. Brian -Original Message- From: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com] Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 8:39 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG

Re: [PSES] Voltage Rating vs Voltage Specification

2017-04-10 Thread Richard Nute
Hi Brian: > Is something like this allowed? > > 100-115-120/208-220-230-240 Unless the applicable standard says otherwise, yes. What is the safety issue (injury) that results from non-compliance with the standard's rules for marking configuration of the input rating? > Will a ±10%

Re: [PSES] Voltage Rating vs Voltage Specification

2017-04-10 Thread John Woodgate
Yes, that means the product works on the lower voltages and to use it on the higher voltages you have to move a switch. There is an IEC standard: IEC 61293 Marking of electrical equipment with ratings related to electrical supply – Safety requirements With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO – Own

Re: [PSES] Voltage Rating vs Voltage Specification

2017-04-10 Thread Kunde, Brian
Is something like this allowed? 100-115-120/208-220-230-240 Will a ±10% tolerance always be assumed? If your tolerance was something different, such as -15%/+10%, does this information have to be on the device or is the manual good enough? The Other Brian -Original Message- From: