Yes!!!
Doug
Sent from my iPhone
IPhone: 408-858-4528
Office: 702-570-6108
Email: d...@dsmith.org
Website: http://dsmith.org
From: IBM Ken
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 4:56:32 PM
To: doug emcesd.com
Cc: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] FCC
Hi Doug- Are you referring to CONELRAD which mandated that all transmitters
go off the air (except for certain 640 and 1240hz MW broadcast stations
which rotated to confuse enemy RDF) in the event of a Soviet attack on the
US? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CONELRAD
-Ken A
On Thu, Oct 31,
Hi John,
The radio listening law was around many decades ago. Usually we just had a #47
pilot lamp on a radio instead of the speaker to know when the station went off
the air. At that point, one was to listen on 640 or 1240 kHz. Only required of
ham radio operators. That went away decades ago.
Apologize if someone else has already answered Rich Nute’s question. Part
(2) interpretation is incorrect. It means that if your Part 15 widget is
susceptible to rf from some licensed transmitter, that’s tough. You don’t
get to complain about it. It doesn’t mean you are prohibited from using the
Hi Folks,
just a quick comment on the LED lights. ANSI has been working hard ( there are
some tricky issues ) to issue C63.29 which will help eliminate a lot of LED
lighting issues. If anyone is curious, I can direct them to the appropriate
committee contact point to learn whats going on.
Well, technically the label for FM and Land mobile receivers is different, per
15.19 (a) (1) from all other devices and does not contain the two parts.
This device complies with part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the
condition that this device does not cause harmful interference.
I would read the FCC two-part statement a little differently.
Let's start with the second statement. It indicates that equipment must accept
interference. It uses "must", so this is a requirement. This just indicates
that the product falls under a category where there are no immunity
I would interpret your radio as being compliant. It accepts the interference just fine. If you don't, that's another matter...Closest thing that the US has to an immunity standard.Respectfully,Brent DeWitt, AB1LF -Original Message-
From: Richard Nute
Sent: Oct 31, 2019 4:24 PM
To:
Precisely. That's bureaucracy for you. Isn't there also a US law that
requires you to listen on a radio for Homeland Security broadcasts?
Everyone is guilty of something.
Best wishes
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
On
“This device complies with part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to
the following two conditions: (1) This device may not cause harmful
interference, and (2) this device must accept any interference received,
including interference that may cause undesired operation”
Hmm.
10 matches
Mail list logo
