Brian
A radio transmitter that is certified for USA and Canada probably does not need
any further certification (subject to Grant Notes and EMF) but does require
testing - see FCC KDB 996369
https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/kdb/forms/FTSSearchResultPage.cfm?id=44637&switch=P
For Europe, a full "asse
Looks very interesting, I'll have to fit it into my reading list
Doug
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 5:42 PM Richard Nute wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hi Doug:
>
>
>
> See:
>
>
>
>
> https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/01446193.2016.1274418?needAccess=true
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Rich
>
>
>
>
>
> *Fro
Hi Doug:
See:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/01446193.2016.1274418?needAccess=true
Best regards,
Rich
From: Douglas Nix
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 8:57 AM
To: Richard Nute
Cc: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Risk assessment versus
Mark,
I did something along those lines back in 2012 when a question came up
about the need for a finger guard on a low power fan. In order to better
understand the possibility of injury, I estimated the surface contact area
of the blade edge against a finger, rotational speed and mass of the fan
Hello all,
I am keenly interested in this discussion on energy vs energy/time with
respect to causing injury, especially from a physical contact
perspective. A couple of other considerations that are worthy to be
included in such a discussion, which would add another layer of
complexity would
Hi Rich,
Your points are well taken.
There are some good ISO standards that relate to exposure to hot and cold
temperatures. These standards take the type of material, and therefore the
transfer rate, of heat into account and are quite useful IMO.
You are right about the HBSE model, and I thin
6 matches
Mail list logo
