Re: [PSES] 62368-1 Openings in a fire enclosure

of 62368-1. Best regards, Glyn From: Richard Nute Reply-To: Date: Wednesday, 22 May 2019 at 19:25 To: "'Payne, Glyn'" , Subject: RE: [PSES] 62368-1 Openings in a fire enclosure Hi Glyn: You have the option of testing the bulkhead connectors in place (Annex S.1

Re: [PSES] 62368-1 Openings in a fire enclosure

think it should be V-1 regardless of it’s proximity to a PIS. Best regards, Glyn From: Lori Young Date: Friday, 17 May 2019 at 14:51 To: "Payne, Glyn" , "EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG" Subject: RE: 62368-1 Openings in a fire enclosure Hi Glyn, If I am und

Re: [PSES] 62368-1 Openings in a fire enclosure

s a sovereign state, not a Zollverein state On 2019-05-17 18:58, Richard Nute wrote: Hmm. Interesting English usage statement. If something fills an opening, the opening no longer exists. So, how do you know how to apply the requirement? Rich From: Payne, Glyn <0d283c0

[PSES] 62368-1 Openings in a fire enclosure

Hi Experts, I have a EN 62368-1 question regarding openings in a fire enclosure… 6.4.8.2.2 Requirements for a fire enclosure Material for components that fill an opening in a fire enclosure or that is intended to be mounted in such opening shall: - comply with the

Re: [PSES] UK Gov Using The UKCA Mark

www.woodjohn.uk Rayleigh, Essex UK On 2019-02-05 10:40, Payne, Glyn wrote: Hi John, Won’t the lack of a MRA with the US effect the FCC SDoC route when getting emission scans done in labs that are accredited by UKAS? Regards, Glyn Payne Validation and Compliance Engineer Solid State

Re: [PSES] UK Gov Using The UKCA Mark

Hi John, Won’t the lack of a MRA with the US effect the FCC SDoC route when getting emission scans done in labs that are accredited by UKAS? Regards, Glyn Payne Validation and Compliance Engineer Solid State Logic - UK Headquarters www.solidstatelogic.com Facebook :