Hi Experts,

 

I have a EN 62368-1 question regarding openings in a fire enclosure…

 

6.4.8.2.2 Requirements for a fire enclosure 

 

Material for components that fill an opening in a fire enclosure or that is 
intended to be 

mounted in such opening shall: 

 

-       comply with the flammability requirements of the relevant IEC component 
standard; or 

-       be made of V-1 class material; or 

-       with Clause S.1. 

 

 

For PS2 and PS3 circuits I have been told by a test house that connectors in 
fire enclosure openings only have to be V-1 class material if they are close to 
a potential ignition source (PIS).

 

My interpretation is that a fire enclosure is a fire enclosure, regardless of 
where, within a fire enclosure a fire may start and so anything filling an 
opening must be V-1.

 

I am interested to know how do other engineers interpret this clause.

 

 

Many thanks,

 

 

 

 

Glyn Payne

 

Compliance and Design Support Engineer

 

 


-- 
Solid State Logic UK LimitedRegistered as a limited company in England and 
Wales (Company No:5362730) Registered Office: 25 Spring Hill Road, 
Begbroke, Oxford OX5 1RU, United Kingdom

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to