...@comcast.net
From: John Allen [mailto:jral...@productsafetyinc.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 11:03 AM
To: Steven Brody; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Multiple Listee for CE
That works perfectly, thanks!! I still would want so see company A's
Technical File.
John Allen
. Company A issues a DoC in their name as the manufacturer and uses
the company B name and model number they mark the product with.
. Company B creates their own TCF using the DoC from company A along
with any additional manuals or instructional information they provide when
they
purposes as part of lifting machinery or lifting
accessories;
_
From: Steven Brody <sgbr...@comcast.net>
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 2:13 PM
To: John Allen; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] Partly Completed Machinery...or not???
John,
In
John,
In the EU Application Guide 2006-42-ec, 2nd Edition, Recital 35, which is in
reference to and an explanation of the first indent of Article2(a), of the
Directive says:
The Machinery Directive does not apply as such to separate machinery
components such as, for example seals,
A suggestion - if your company name, city and state, are already on the
label or nameplate, ask your local postal facility if that is sufficient for
mail to be delivered to your company. This came up with a firm I used to
work for many years ago and when asked the local post office said that
However, Scott has said 'The product will also go into standby if it loses
communication with the controller ' so if there is no controller it will
always be in standby mode and would appear to comply. As John noted when
joined the product and controller become a 'system', and the 'system',
Scott,
Questions:
1. What is the power source for the product – internal mains fed power
supply or external brick
2. What is the power source for the controller – internal mains fed power
supply or external brick
3. Is the product sold alone or is the external controller
Carl,
It depends on how the product is marketed and who it is sold to. Also, was
the standard used for evaluation part of the EN 61010-x family, which would
then ensure it is part of Measurement and Control Equipment.
In the 12 December 2012 version of the RoHS2 FAQ, which is he first one
Derek,
Since there are moving parts involved this would probably fall under the
Machinery Directive which would suggest EN 60204-1 as a generic standard for
the telescope, and EN 61010-1 for the electronic control system. A risk
assessment would also need to be carried out as appropriate for
In the realm of industrial use products on the DoC or Do we had the number
and name of the standard(s) that were used to confirm conformance to the
Directive. While market surveillance was never a problem for us, and
customs in one EU Member State only questioned our product once, and that
due to
Doug,
In a previous life in the semiconductor and related industries the Japanese
customers were satisfied with reports by a 3rd party, not certifications, to
IEC/EN 60204-1 and IEC/EN 61010-1, as each is appropriate for the product,
US NFPA 79, ISO 10218-1 for robots, and ANSI/RIA 15.06, which
Tom,
The logo is the China RoHS Environment Friendly Use Period logo - it should
be green if the substances are all under the limits or not present, and It
would be orange if any of them were above or if you did not know, with a
number inside where the e is. That number would be a manufacturer
Received.
Steve Brody
sgbr...@comcast.net
-Original Message-
From: Macy [mailto:m...@basicisp.net]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 10:20 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] test message MYBasicISP.net mailserver
test to determine if the mail server sends to IEEE group
-
We have a chiller installed in a customer application where RF is used in their
process, but we believe RF is being transmitted to our product via the fluid.
Soe anh one have any suggestions on how to measure RF in fluids - type of
equipment, etc.?
Thanks in advance and best wishes o the
Dear all,
I was recently told by a well known switch manufacturer that their one of
their products which was UL/CSA/VDE approved, would no longer be available
due to a VDE standards change that impacted the spacings between the
contacts. However, they were not able to tell me which standard
15 matches
Mail list logo
