>From a RF Health and Safety point of view, why is a microwave oven allowed
>with just an interlock on the door and not allowed for a RF enclosure for EMC?
Human Exposure Limit will not apply if no human is in RF chamber when RF is on.
Michael Sundstrom
OHD TREQ Dallas
Electronic Lab Analyst EM
When I mind meld it doesn’t work for them. Just me!
Michael Sundstrom
OHD TREQ Dallas
Electronic Lab Analyst EMC Lead
(214) 579 6312 office
(940) 390 3644 cell
マイク
KB5UKT
From: jral...@productsafetyinc.com [mailto:jral...@productsafetyinc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 2:27 PM
To: EMC-PS
Seems like a VLF LISN for below 150kHz might be what he is looking for, asking
about?? Just guessing?
Michael Sundstrom
OHD TREQ Dallas
Electronic Lab Analyst EMC Lead
(214) 579 6312 office
(940) 390 3644 cell
マイク
KB5UKT
From: Ed Price [mailto:edpr...@cox.net]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013
Brian,
I'd test a 450 Lbs. device on a rolling cart, but this makes it a floor
standing test then???
When I was at Nokia we had a closed cell foam 'table' 80cm tall by 1.25 m
wide we used. It could hold 100 Lbs. maybe, not sure you'll find anything for
450 Lbs.???
Maybe a foam table with a pla
Just wait till all the mercury starts contaminating.
Michael Sundstrom
OHD TREQ Dallas
Electronic Lab Analyst EMC Lead
(214) 579 6312 office
(940) 390 3644 cell
マイク
KB5UKT
-Original Message-
From: John Cotman [mailto:john.cot...@conformance.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2013 10:
Ian,
The Conducted RF Limits Frequency Band are lower than your stated starting
point.
Conducted Frequency limits for FCC are 450kHz to 30MHz.
Conducted Frequency limits for CISPR are 150kHz to 30MHz.
Now the FCC has said that it will accept the CISPR data, (47CFR15.33 I think)
and Canada has sa
Tom,
I was always taught FFC + FCC doesn't = FCC compliant...
Or
CE + CE doesn't = CE
The whole system needs to be tested, because all combinations can't be covered
by any one manufacturer testing.
Michael Sundstrom
OHD TREQ Dallas
Electronic Lab Analyst EMC Lead
(214) 579 6312 office
(940) 39
Who has any SAR equipment up past 10GHz or so?
Michael Sundstrom
OHD TREQ Dallas
Electronic Lab Analyst EMC Lead
(214) 579 6312 office
(940) 390 3644 cell
マイク
KB5UKT
-Original Message-
From: Kunde, Brian [mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 2:22 PM
To: EM
I once had an auditor who dinged me on not keeping the cables centered in the
injection clamp. Next day I had foam cell material in the clamp, pretty much
kept the cables centered. I don’t think it made much difference??? Well, no
difference that I could see…
Michael Sundstrom
OHD TREQ Dallas
I thought the ISM 430 MHz band, had way less than 500 mW levels ???
Michael Sundstrom
OHD TREQ Dallas
Electronic Lab Analyst EMC Lead
(214) 579 6312 office
(940) 390 3644 cell
KB5UKT
From: Anthony Thomson [mailto:ton...@europe.com]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 8:04 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEE
And here all these years I thought it meant: Compliance Extraordinary...
Michael Sundstrom
OHD TREQ Dallas
Electronic Lab Analyst EMC Lead
(214) 579 6312 office
(940) 390 3644 cell
KB5UKT
-Original Message-
From: Crane, Lauren [mailto:lauren.cr...@kla-tencor.com]
Sent: Thursday, Augu
I'm betting on a broken connectorlook at each connector with a magnifier!
Michael Sundstrom
OHD TREQ Dallas
Electronic Lab Analyst EMC Lead
(214) 579 6312 office
(940) 390 3644 cell
KB5UKT
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, August
I thought (at one time) the backup to CDMA was AMPS service?
Michael Sundstrom
OHD TREQ Dallas
Electronic Lab Analyst EMC Lead
(214) 579 6312 office
(940) 390 3644 cell
KB5UKT
From: IBM Ken [mailto:ibm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 7:57 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject:
Highest frequency utilized in device.
Michael Sundstrom
OHD TREQ Dallas
Electronic Lab Analyst EMC Lead
(214) 579 6312 office
(940) 390 3644 cell
KB5UKT
From: Mcburney, Ian [mailto:ian.mcbur...@dmh-global.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 10:13 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES]
I’ll bet shockingly well!
Michael Sundstrom
OHD TREQ Dallas
Electronic Lab Analyst EMC Lead
(214) 579 6312 office
(940) 390 3644 cell
KB5UKT
From: Chan Moore [mailto:cmo...@brocade.com]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 11:05 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] "Compliance costs to
Scott,
I would isolate the internal house data equipment on a surge protector / filter
AC power box. This will ally some of the conducted power line issues you ask
about.
I'd then get online at the problem time and shut off each of the house
breakers one at a time while seeing if the data clear
No that applies to 'Good Engineering Practice' .
I also have been told 'due diligence' is easy to prove with test data, seems
to be harder without test data.
Michael Sundstrom
OHD TREQ Dallas
Electronic Lab Analyst EMC Lead
(214) 579 6312 office
(940) 390 3644 cell
KB5UKT
-Original Me
No he will just say More as the AHJ is named Ron...i.e. more ron!
Or something like that!
Michael Sundstrom
OHD TREQ Dallas
Electronic Lab Analyst EMC Lead
(214) 579 6312 office
(940) 390 3644 cell
KB5UKT
-Original Message-
From: Peter Tarver [mailto:ptar...@enphaseenergy.com]
Sent:
Grace,
You are paying the contractor for his expertise in NSA. So I'd assume if it was
done wrong they'd have to come back and do it right?
Michael Sundstrom
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 2:28 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTS
Bill,
I'd guess 6dB as in voltage, with dBuV being used.
Michael Sundstrom
OHD / TREQ Dallas
Electronic Lab Analyst, EMC Lead
2170 French Settlement Rd, Suite B
Dallas, Texas 75212
(214) 579 6312
(940) 390 3644c
KB5UKT
Albert Einstein once said, "The definition of insanity is doing the same thi
Two antennas???
Michael Sundstrom
OHD / TREQ Dallas
Electronic Lab Analyst, EMC Lead
2170 French Settlement Rd, Suite B
Dallas, Texas 75212
(214) 579 6312
(940) 390 3644c
KB5UKT
Albert Einstein once said, "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing
over and over again and expecting dif
Richard Schultz (of ANSI C63) always told me there were 3 answer to any EMC
question asking about 'if' it will affect something?
YES
NO
MAYBE
I'd guess Mr. Schultz knew enough to say that!
Michael Sundstrom
OHD / TREQ Dallas
Electronic Lab Analyst, EMC Lead
2170 French Settlement Rd, Suite B
Da
Brian,
To be honest, who knows why UL does what they do? It appears that for years
they have arranged test levels just to be different from IEC or whatever
entity.
Just my two cents,
Michael Sundstrom
OHD / TREQ Dallas
Electronic Lab Analyst, EMC Lead
2170 French Settlement Rd, Suite B
Dallas
Guys,
I don't think we want to forget that just one of these units will be in
use. What would a whole country full of these units do to a mains
network? I'd guess it to be very noisy indeed!
Michael Sundstrom
NOKIA
TCC Dallas / EMC
ofc: (972) 374-1462
cell: (817) 917-5021
amateur
The only problem I see with not calibrating the LISN is you wouldn't
know if / or when it goes bad until you cross check it with a calibrated
LISN.
I would suggest you run your precompliance lab just like the real lab.
This way you'll get the same results as the accredited lab you test
with. No
We use a styrofoam table here at our lab, it is a round plug of
styrofoam 80cm tall and 1m across. This has worked the best for us, and
it has the least reflections at any frequency we can reliably test at. I
would guess that some form of hard material on top of this type of table
would support 20
Most analyzers are not CISPR 16 compliant. Receivers are always easer to
read QP and Avg. directly. If you can pass the CISPR limits with a peak
reading (analyzer), you can most definitely pass the QP / Avg. limits
with a receiver.
For official testing a compliant (CISPR 16) device is always nee
27 matches
Mail list logo