Richard Hughes said:
++ Moreover, since the said telephone is connected only to an SELV
Circuit then
++ it falls below the lower voltage limits of the LVD (50 Vac, 75 Vdc)
and so
++ the LVD does not apply.
I thought the RTTED referral to the LVD removed the voltage limits of
the latter? That
G'Day!
Anybody know if EN61000-3-3 (fluctuations & flicker for equipment
drawing <16A) will be *replaced* by EN61000-3-11 (fluctuations & flicker
for equipment drawing <75A) on 1st Dec 2003?
Or are the scopes different and hence both will exist?
Regards
Alan
(Apologies - this is the second sending of this query - I used the wrong
emc-pstc address the first time - D'oh!)
G'Day!
I've been looking at EU Directives for transmitters for the first time,
and have got confused. Some questions:
Q1)
--
For radio transmitting equipment, as covered by Article
G'Day!
I've been looking at EU Directives for transmitters for the first time,
and have got confused. Some questions:
Q1)
--
For radio transmitting equipment, as covered by Article 10(5) of the EMC
Directive, there is a need for an EC-type examination certificate by a
notified body. However, the
With regard to radiated emission immunity and EN61000-4-3 (or IEC 801-3)
I believe there are different field strengths used, depending on the
environment in which the apparatus being tested is to be used.
I believe equipment to be used in a well-protected environment may be
tested at a lower imm
My apologies to any colleagues in the forum who found my recent .sig
regarding Mormons/polygamy etc. offensive - naturally, no offence was
intended.
Some (including a Mormon) mailed me to say they found it humorous (which is
an unusual act in itself) but inaccurate, and some mailed to say they fou
If I remember correctly, it's the Competent Body - the person who approves
(hopefully!) and signs the Technical Construction File - who must be
resident in the EU. (So he's not needed for self-certification)
Mind you, this is probably a moot point, now that the EU/USA have signed a
Mutual Recognit
If I remember correctly, it's the Competent Body - the person who approves
(hopefully!) and signs the Technical Construction File - who must be
resident in the EU.
Mind you, this is probably a moot point, now that the EU/USA have signed a
Mutual Recognition Agreement, I assume the USA can now test
G'Day all !
Just got my grubby hands on a copy of the UK DTI's disc containing the new
guidelines AND the annexes (all in .doc format).
Not that the annexes are much use, (the original annexes weren't much use
either, if I remember rightly) - and they are obviously not quite ready for
UK publicat
G'Day all!
Anyone know anything about the regulatory requirements, import restrictions,
etc. for ITE-based (but non-telecom) products destined for India?
I'm particularly interested in mandatory EMC or safety regulations.
Any info appreciated - including people/places to contact.
--
Alan
I da
ly about issue 6, as it was
re-issued in late '95/early '96 to include the EU EMC
Directive, amongst other things.
You'll find it at http://www.dstan.mod.uk
Regards,
--
Alan Hudson
Marconi Simulation (Scotland, UK)
mailto:alan.hud...@gecm.com
> while I*M has a list for harmonized directives that does
> not include it. (http://www2.echo.lu/nasd/).
>
> My boss and I are hoping to resolve these issues down
> to a fundamental reference. Does the OJ publish a list
> for the different directives?
[snip]
--
Alan Hudson
Marconi Simulation (Scotland, UK)
mailto:alan.hud...@gecm.com
ong) that this is in
> reference to computer equipment and software which is
> intended for use on IBM-compatible computers running DOS,
> Windows (3.1, 95, NT). What other details can anyone help
> me with? Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
--
Alan Hudson
Marcon
enlo Park, CA, USA
> sc...@streamlogic.com
> (415) 833-4505
>
-- -
Alan Hudson
Marconi Simulation (Scotland, UK)
mailto:alan.hud...@gecm.com
> found at:-
>
> http://www.emc-journal.co.uk/newguide.html
>
> Webmaster
> Nutwood UK Ltd
>
-- -
Alan Hudson
Marconi Simulation (Scotland, UK)
mailto:alan.hud...@gecm.com
o have anybody in California.
But you could try emailing them to verify - try
customersupport@notes.compuserve.com
Regards,
-- -----
Alan Hudson
Marconi Simulation (Scotland, UK)
mailto:alan.hud...@gecm.com
ect, e.g
immunity problems from magnetic fields, radiated emissions
from sparks during the rain, or what?
Anybody else had a similar case, i.e. anyone "been there",
"seen it", "had it done to me"?
Any and all input welcome!
-- -----
be of great help.
> >I've already looked throughout our applicable directives and saw nothing
> >with regard to demo or prototype equipment.
> >
> >Thanks to all for your help.
> >
> >Andy Garcia
> >Lead EMC/Safety Engineer
> >Coulter Corporation
> >Miami, FL
> >
>
-- -
Alan Hudson
Marconi Simulation (Scotland, UK)
mailto:alan.hud...@gecm.com
With regard to "Rumour (c)", I forgot to mention that
there's an article on how HP interpreted the
Harmonics/Flicker standards, and designed their test gear,
on Page 26 of the Nov/Dec 96 issue of "Approval".
Alan Hudson
ot; or
unofficially), so I cannot be sure if anything will
actually come of it all.
Regards,
-- -
Alan Hudson
Marconi Simulation (Scotland, UK)
mailto:alan.hud...@gecm.com
71/316/EEC - Measuring Instruments and methods for
metrological Control.
This has been amended three times by Directives 72/427/EEC,
83/575/EEC, and 87/355/EEC.
Sorry, that's all I could find out...
--
Alan Hudson
email: hud...@msim.co.uk
; connectors ? What about a case where the air discharge is not directed at
> the pins but rather the connector shell, but ultimately arcs over to the
> pins ? In this case, is this test point legit, or is this particular
> dicharge deleted from the test data and repeated ?
>
--
Alan Hudson
email: hud...@msim.co.uk
can help?
-- -----
Alan Hudson
EMC/EW Specialist
Marconi Simulation (Scotland, UK)
mailto:alan.hud...@gecm.com
by any Directive.
Don't know that this helps, but you never know...
Regards,
-- ---------
Alan Hudson
EMC/EW Specialist
Marconi Simulation (Scotland, UK)
mailto:alan.hud...@gecm.com
24 matches
Mail list logo