In a message dated 3/24/99 5:58:27 PM Central Standard Time,
e...@brianjones.co.uk writes:
> Those EMC aspects covered by harmonised standards, and not the TCF, would
> indeed need to be reconsidered if one of those standards is changed,
> because that part of the EMC compliance has been demon
lfresea...@aol.com wrote:
>
> Brian,
>
> I'm not sure that I agree with you on your TCF statement. Our TCF's reference
> Harmonized documents, when these change I'm expecting that we will have to
> update our TCF for what ever changes are introduced.
>
> You don't agree?
>
> Derek.
Derek
Wit
Brian,
I'm not sure that I agree with you on your TCF statement. Our TCF's reference
Harmonized documents, when these change I'm expecting that we will have to
update our TCF for what ever changes are introduced.
You don't agree?
Derek.
-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discuss
--- Begin Message ---
ari.honk...@nokia.com wrote:
>
> The second scenario is correct.
> You might consider employing a competent body and use 10.2 route to
> compliance.
> If a TCF is used instead a harmonised standard, there will be nothing that
> could be
> superseded.
> regards,
> Ari
> > ---
4 matches
Mail list logo
