*Hi Rich;*
I agree that 62368 attempts to allow for more flexibility the process of
designing a safe product, but in the specific case of fire enclosures there
is in fact a considerable impact where some existing product can not be
certified to the new standard without significant product redesign
I agree that 62368 attempts to allow for more flexibility the process of
designing a safe product, but in the specific case of fire enclosures there is
in fact a considerable impact where some existing product can not be certified
to the new standard without significant product redesign.
O'Connell [mailto:oconne...@tamuracorp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 7:05 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] [BULK] Re: [PSES] Fire requirements in standards
Generally concur. Even for a 61010-1 shop, there will be times when you will
need this if an incorporated compon
RG>
Subject: Re: [PSES] [BULK] Re: [PSES] Fire requirements in standards
IBM Ken,
My main interest at this time is with the fire enclosure. Our products fall
under the 61010-1, and it’s been years since I have read 60950, but I can see
where improvements in the constructional requirements in a fi
rs for the
discerning designer...
Brian
From: Ted Eckert [mailto:07cf6ebeab9d-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 10:28 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] [BULK] Re: [PSES] Fire requirements in standards
Hello Brian,
This is a fairly simplistic view, but
y in the design options if you use the new
> requirements over the old.
>
>
>
> Ted Eckert
>
> Microsoft Corporation
>
>
>
> The opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of
> my employer.
>
>
>
> *From:* Kunde, Brian [mailto:brian
[mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 9:24 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] [BULK] Re: [PSES] Fire requirements in standards
IBM Ken,
My main interest at this time is with the fire enclosure. Our products fall
under the 61010-1, and it’s been years since
IBM Ken,
My main interest at this time is with the fire enclosure. Our products fall
under the 61010-1, and it’s been years since I have read 60950, but I can see
where improvements in the constructional requirements in a fire enclosure could
be made. It seems our mechanical engineers sometime
8 matches
Mail list logo
