<ted.eck...@microsoft.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 1:08 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] [SPAM] Re: [PSES] Commom mode current vs. differential mode
current and LISN
I have only one minor objection to Scott’s comments. He implies that wiring
done by an elect
is not the only source of
non-guaranteed neutral wiring in the US.
-Dave
From: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 12:37 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] [SPAM] Re: [PSES] Commom mode current vs. differential mode
current and LISN
Quite right
and do not necessarily reflect those of my
employer.
From: Scott Aldous [mailto:0220f70c299a-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 8:33 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] [SPAM] Re: [PSES] Commom mode current vs. differential mode
current and LISN
ct: Re: [PSES] [SPAM] Re: [PSES] Commom mode current vs. differential mode
current and LISN
That assumes that the input neutral in the product is always actually connected
to the neutral of the supply. Even with polarized plugs (or plugs in a
configuration where the connection itself
y low enough that an
> additional 4.7 nF makes insufficient difference to justify its inclusion.
> An experiment is indicated.
>
>
>
> *From:* Richard Marshall [mailto:richard.marshal...@btinternet.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 14, 2016 10:34 AM
> *To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> *
...@btinternet.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 10:34 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [SPAM] Re: [PSES] Commom mode current vs. differential mode current
and LISN
Re Richard Nute's "All of the products I have seen have two Y capacitors,
one from L to E, and one from N to E. "
6 matches
Mail list logo
