Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 1:08 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] [SPAM] Re: [PSES] Commom mode current vs. differential mode
current and LISN
I have only one minor objection to Scott’s comments. He implies that wiring
done by an electrician will be done correctly. I’ve
only source of
non-guaranteed neutral wiring in the US.
-Dave
From: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 12:37 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] [SPAM] Re: [PSES] Commom mode current vs. differential mode
current and LISN
Quite right
and do not necessarily reflect those of my
employer.
From: Scott Aldous [mailto:0220f70c299a-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 8:33 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] [SPAM] Re: [PSES] Commom mode current vs. differential mode
current and LISN
That
: [PSES] Commom mode current vs. differential mode
current and LISN
That assumes that the input neutral in the product is always actually connected
to the neutral of the supply. Even with polarized plugs (or plugs in a
configuration where the connection itself cannot be reversed) it is possible
for
That assumes that the input neutral in the product is always actually
connected to the neutral of the supply. Even with polarized plugs (or plugs
in a configuration where the connection itself cannot be reversed) it is
possible for residential house wiring to be incorrect. This is fairly
common in
I suppose it has been realised (or assumed?) that the impedance from N to
E, even at quite high frequencies, is already low enough that an additional
4.7 nF makes insufficient difference to justify its inclusion. An experiment
is indicated.
From: Richard Marshall [mailto:richard.marshal...@bt
6 matches
Mail list logo
