Re: [PSES] Electronic versions of standards and DRM - off topic

2016-07-06 Thread Ralph McDiarmid
And, after all, what's wrong with BASIC?It's not the language, but rather how you use it. I've seen great programs in BASIC and horrible ones in C. Ralph McDiarmid Product Compliance Engineering Solar Business Schneider Electric -Original Message- From: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1

Re: [PSES] Electronic versions of standards and DRM - off topic

2016-07-06 Thread Brian O'Connell
est coverage was not pushed to the fore for the 'IoT' and wearables presentations at the 2016 ISPCE. Brian -Original Message- From: Ralph McDiarmid [mailto:ralph.mcdiar...@schneider-electric.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2016 11:43 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: R

Re: [PSES] Electronic versions of standards and DRM - off topic

2016-07-06 Thread John Woodgate
.co.uk J M Woodgate and Associates Rayleigh England We live in exiting times -Original Message- From: Brian O'Connell [mailto:oconne...@tamuracorp.com] Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:09 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Electronic versions of standards and DRM - off topi

Re: [PSES] Electronic versions of standards and DRM - off topic

2016-07-07 Thread Ted Eckert
, July 6, 2016 5:09 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Electronic versions of standards and DRM - off topic Greetings to Human-unit RalphMcDiarmid, Suppose that you could be found in attendance during Darmouth's 50th anniversary celebration for basic? Upon my imperial (e

Re: [PSES] Electronic versions of standards and DRM - off topic

2016-07-07 Thread Brian O'Connell
O'Connell; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE: [PSES] Electronic versions of standards and DRM - off topic Could the reason for 'parting thought' be that those subjects require deep understanding, not just a facility for coding? Like the difference between a peer-reviewed pape

Re: [PSES] Electronic versions of standards and DRM - off topic

2016-07-07 Thread Brian O'Connell
AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Electronic versions of standards and DRM - off topic Hello Brian, ISPCE has had some coverage of code safety, but it is typically in the medical track. This is one area where code review has been standard for some time. However, I have fo

Re: [PSES] Electronic versions of standards and DRM - off topic

2016-07-07 Thread Ted Eckert
to:07cf6ebeab9d-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org] Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2016 7:05 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Electronic versions of standards and DRM - off topic Hello Brian, ISPCE has had some coverage of code safety, but it is typically in the medical track. This is one area w

Re: [PSES] Electronic versions of standards and DRM - off topic

2016-07-11 Thread Ralph McDiarmid
ge- From: Ted Eckert [mailto:07cf6ebeab9d-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org] Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2016 1:56 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Electronic versions of standards and DRM - off topic Hello Brian, I think that the Technical Program Committee (TPC) has expanded its ra

Re: [PSES] Electronic versions of standards and DRM - off topic

2016-07-12 Thread Douglas Nix
; Ralph McDiarmid > Product Compliance > Engineering > Solar Business > Schneider Electric > > > -Original Message- > From: Ted Eckert [mailto:000007cf6ebeab9d-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org] > Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2016 1:56 PM > To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG >