In message , dated Wed, 7 Apr
2010, Nick Williams writes:
>One the problems with which being that there are clearly many
>committees which do not understand the difference between 'normative'
>and 'informative'. This does not tend to be a problem with CENELEC
>standards but it's clear from ma
At 17:24 +0100 7/4/10, John Woodgate wrote:
One the problems with which being that there are clearly many
committees which do not understand the difference between 'normative'
and 'informative'. This does not tend to be a problem with CENELEC
standards but it's clear from many of the CEN stan
In message <002501cad660$c4bd5f70$d600a...@tamuracorp.com>, dated Wed, 7
Apr 2010, Brian O'Connell writes:
>The scope statement seems to indicate that 62477 is intended to codify
>the overlap between 60364, 60050, and a product family safety standard.
You didn't mean 60050, I think. 60950 alre
STSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: Re: [PSES] Generic safety standard discussion
>
>
> In message <002a01cad5c6$0a883520$d600a...@tamuracorp.com>,
> dated Tue, 6
> Apr 2010, Brian O'Connell writes:
>
> >The standard seems to be in vote. Could someone point me t
In message <002a01cad5c6$0a883520$d600a...@tamuracorp.com>, dated Tue, 6
Apr 2010, Brian O'Connell writes:
>The standard seems to be in vote. Could someone point me to the scope
>statement for 62477 ?
The standard runs to 166 pages! I think it is permissible to show the
scope only, of the fir
-electric.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 12:06 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Generic safety standard discussion
There is also an effort under way to write an IEC "Group Safety Function" (ie
horizontal) standard for safety of power conversion equipment, IEC 62477.
T
this e-mail
From: Pete Perkins
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: 04/06/2010 11:28 AM
Subject: [PSES] Generic safety standard discussion
7 matches
Mail list logo
