roubleshooting activities for our customers’ projects. I’m contactable
> between 1300h to 1730h from Monday to Friday.*
>
> *For inquiries, bookings, and testing updates please send us an email on
> he...@unit3compliance.co.uk or call 01274
> 911747. Our lead times for testing and consultancy are ty
he...@unit3compliance.co.uk> or call 01274
911747. Our lead times for testing and consultancy are typically 4-5 weeks.
From: Chas Grasso
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2023 8:39 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Simulation of signal source under a pwb shield
Hello e
Hi Chaz,
My thought is that concern over the simulated antenna can be neglected
if the the source is "electrically short dipole" at the frequency of
interest. Simulating with the radiated field from such a source, with
and without the shield, at a far field distance, should give you a
decent
:38 PM
To:
Subject: [PSES] Simulation of signal source under a pwb shield
Hello experts and gurus!!
I need to simulate the performance of a BLS (board level shield) and I am
considering
using the IEEE Std 2716-2022 IEEE Guide for the Characterization of the
Effectiveness of Printed Circuit
I suggest that a suitable source for evaluating the shielding
effectiveness of a BLS is a multivibrator (square-wave source), with
attention to rise and fall times: not too slow and not ridiculously
fast. It's more representative of emitting sources than a canned antenna.
=
Hello experts and gurus!!
I need to simulate the performance of a BLS (board level shield) and I am
considering
using the IEEE Std 2716-2022 IEEE Guide for the Characterization of the
Effectiveness of Printed Circuit Board Level Shielding document. This
document is however an adaptation of
the met
6 matches
Mail list logo
