-Original Message-
From: Brian Oconnell [mailto:oconne...@tamuracorp.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 10:46
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] standards update and legal madness
None of this is a representation of my employer.
A company makes a component for North American
-Original Message-
From: John Shinn [mailto:jmsh...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 1:09 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] standards update and legal madness
1. John Woodgate makes an excellent point regarding why didn't the
manufacture
know about the Standard
- The customer could also view the situation as the standards body
performing due diligence, and making corrections to the standard when they
discover issues. Performing standards maintenance helps protect the
customer in case of user lawsuits.
- I wonder if there's an 'errors and omissions'
Hi Brian:
... they want to see complete list of organizations
and individuals that contributed to the errors that
caused a mandatory update to the standard.
Errors is an assumption made by the customer lawyers.
I would disagree that the mandatory updates were due to
errors.
Seldom do published
FWIW, the legal dorks seem to be backing off. Probably because they did not see
a big pay day.
Agree, in part, with Mr. Woodgate that the industry 'gets what they deserve'.
But we have previously discussed the limits of corporate and individual
participation in the standards development
In message
e2bb98c9e17843a6ad8d5d1d6159b...@blupr02mb116.namprd02.prod.outlook.com
, dated Sat, 9 Nov 2013, Brian Oconnell oconne...@tamuracorp.com
writes:
The other reason will never serve on a committee is that I am not an
expert on any single subject area,
That's NOT a disadvantage, at
None of this is a representation of my employer.
A company makes a component for North American market designed for the needs of
a single customer. The company received notices from CSA and UL with tabulation
of standards corrections. The company informed affected customer of time and
cost to
.
Mike Sherman
Product Safety and Compliance Engineer
Graco Inc.
- Original Message -
From: Brian Oconnell oconne...@tamuracorp.com
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Sent: Friday, November 8, 2013 12:45:43 PM
Subject: [PSES] standards update and legal madness
None
In message
518cfcd229674efe916347038430c...@blupr02mb116.namprd02.prod.outlook.com
, dated Fri, 8 Nov 2013, Brian Oconnell oconne...@tamuracorp.com
writes:
A company makes a component for North American market designed for the
needs of a single customer. The company received notices from CSA
-
From: John Woodgate
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 11:45 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] standards update and legal madness
In message
518cfcd229674efe916347038430c...@blupr02mb116.namprd02.prod.outlook.com
, dated Fri, 8 Nov 2013, Brian Oconnell oconne...@tamuracorp.com
@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] standards update and legal madness
1. John Woodgate makes an excellent point regarding why didn't the
manufacture
know about the Standard Changes.
2. Does the manufacturer build to the customer's prints and requirements?
If so,
why didn't the customer know about
In message
ec11e1c1995c4e5a9a1245d6b62d3...@blupr02mb116.namprd02.prod.outlook.com
, dated Sat, 9 Nov 2013, Brian Oconnell oconne...@tamuracorp.com
writes:
The notices used phrases such as correction of typographical errors
and correction of incorrect requirements and correction of
12 matches
Mail list logo
