riginal Message -
From: Price, Edward <mailto:ed.pr...@cubic.com>
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Sent: 1/6/2011 5:24:53 PM
Subject: RE: Disturbance Voltage at Mains Terminals per CISPR 15/EN
55015
Applying a low-pass filter to the FCC
Is Our Specialty
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Grace Lin
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 9:08 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: Disturbance Voltage at Mains Terminals per CISPR 15/EN 55015
Dear Members,
Thank you very very much to those who have
age.
Van: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] Namens Price, Edward
Verzonden: donderdag 6 januari 2011 14:51
Aan: emc-pstc
Onderwerp: RE: [PSES] Disturbance Voltage at Mains Terminals per CISPR 15/EN
55015
Way back when I used to use receivers, there was this attenuator cont
Dear Members,
Thank you very very much to those who have replied. Please find the following
FCC response for your reference.
"
Inquiry:
When taking AC power line conducted emission data for a lighting/digital
device, should emissions from switching a relay (to turn on and off a lighting
dev
ltage at Mains Terminals per CISPR
> 15/EN 55015
>
> > When making the measurement the CISPR detector function (I thought)
> was
> > there to deal with low repetition rate disturbances. Does this not
> apply
> > in this case? If not - why not?
>
> Becaus
org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] Namens Haynes, Tim (SELEX
GALILEO, UK)
Verzonden: Thursday, January 06, 2011 9:30 AM
Aan: John Woodgate; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Onderwerp: RE: [PSES] Disturbance Voltage at Mains Terminals per CISPR 15/EN
55015
HI,
Happy New Year to all.
When making the measuremen
es of people in the world-those who understand binary
and those who don't. J. Paxman
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: 06 January 2011 08:56
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Disturbance Voltage at Mains Terminals per CISPR
1
In message
<201048ea81ba0745aca78e4cc8839001090a7...@desmdswms201.des.grplnk.net>,
dated Thu, 6 Jan 2011, "Haynes, Tim (SELEX GALILEO, UK)"
writes:
>When making the measurement the CISPR detector function (I thought) was
>there to deal with low repetition rate disturbances. Does this not
>ap
s per CISPR
15/EN 55015
*** WARNING ***
This message has originated outside your organisation,
either from an external partner or the Global Internet.
Keep this in mind if you answer this message.
In message
, dated
Wed, 5 Jan 2011, Grace Lin writes:
>Do y
an EMC disturbance
which you are required to assess. CISPR 15 used, if I remember
correctly, to refer to CISPR 14 for the measurement of clicks. It
doesn't do that now, but for Europe you can still apply the provisions
of EN 55014-1 if they allow your product to pass.
In other words, you
CISPR 15/EN 55015
Do you agree with "Test should be done with relay on or relay off. These are
the normal states. Cycling relay will cause arcing affected all results"?
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Grace Lin wrote:
Dear Members,
Happ
Dear Members,
Happy New Year.
When taking data for the above-referenced test, should emissions from
switching a relay (to turn on and off a lighting device) be counted? During
switching, the emission jumps about 20 dB.
Thank you very much and look forward to hearing from you.
Best regards,
Do you agree with "Test should be done with relay on or relay off. These are
the normal states. Cycling relay will cause arcing affected all results"?
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Grace Lin wrote:
Dear Members,
Happy New Year.
When taking data fo
In message
<2a93eb060901261200q1c1afb73s7038f0edfa7d8...@mail.gmail.com>, dated
Mon, 26 Jan 2009, Grace Lin writes:
>One more question:
>What is the role of CISPR 16 series to CISPR family standards, such as
>CISPR 15? For example, I though disturbance voltage measurement
Thank you very much, John.
One more question:
What is the role of CISPR 16 series to CISPR family standards, such as CISPR
15? For example, I though disturbance voltage measurement mentioned in CISPR
15 should follow CISPR 16-2-1. From what I have learned from you, it seems
CISPR 16 series are
#x27;t see any reference to a
>ground plane. So your colleague APPEARS to be right. But I suspect that
>there is a problem with the standard, because the AMN is always used
>with a ground plane.
I have *unofficial* agreement that the current CISPR 15 does not call
for a ground plane i
idn't know what type of product was involved.
>I cannot locate B.2. from my copy (CISPR 15 @ IEC:2005).
It's the second clause of Annex B. If you haven't got an Annex B, there
is something missing from your standard!
>Based on these, my colleague insists groundplanes are not
John,
Thank you very much for the quick comment.
The EUT are relay switches and dimmers. Section 7.3 is for Luninaire.
Section 8.2 is for Indoor and Outdoor Luminaires. Section 8.9 is for lamps.
I cannot locate B.2. from my copy (CISPR 15 @ IEC:2005). Based on these, my
colleague insists
In message <2a93eb060901230445wca4fbc7t9e4a359e67963...@mail.gmail.com>,
dated Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Grace Lin writes:
>Are vertical and horizontal groundplanes required for measuring
>disturbance voltages per Section 4.3 of CISPR 15? CISPR 15 doesn't
>mention any ground
Dear Members,
Are vertical and horizontal groundplanes required for measuring disturbance
voltages per Section 4.3 of CISPR 15? CISPR 15 doesn't mention any
groundplane while CISPR 22 does. My colleague concludes that groundplanes are
not required. Do you agree with the conclusion?
Folks,
in the CISPR 15 loop antenna there is a current probe specified. Can
anyone direct me to a source please? I'm struggling.
Thanks,
Derek Walton
L F Research
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.Website: http://www
Hi,
has anyone any idea where I can get the lamp fixtures illustrated in Fig 5a-f
of EN55015.
Thanks,
Derek,
easurement per CISPR 15
>
>Hi all
>
>I got a question about the magnetic measurement per CISPR 15, it says that
the sensitivity of the current probe is 1V/A.
>
>My interpretation is that X dBuV measurement you got from the EMI
receiver, corresponding to XdBuA, which is then compa
Hi all
I got a question about the magnetic measurement per CISPR 15, it says that the
sensitivity of the current probe is 1V/A.
My interpretation is that X dBuV measurement you got from the EMI receiver,
corresponding to XdBuA, which is then compared to the limit, say 88dBuA at 50
kHz for 2
Hi all:
Could someone guide me on sourcing the following hardware for CISPR 15: 1996
(Lighting Equipment EMI):
Van Veen Loop
Van Veen Loop 1V/A Current Probe: 9kHz-30 MHz.
Conical Housing
Dummy Lamps
Balance to Unbalance transformer
If not available, I could build and calibrate these myself
25 matches
Mail list logo
