Component Qualification - Thanks

2000-09-23 Thread Koh Nai Ghee
Hi, Thanks to all that has responded to my questions and providing your precious advice. Regards Koh --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to:

Re: Component Qualification

2000-09-23 Thread Lfresearch
Tony, we have an EMScan, and found it to be of limited use. If you have a board with components that protect peripheral interfaces, you really need to test with the interfaces present in the same fashion that you would run a Qual test. A precompliance facility does a better job than EMScan for

Re: Component Qualification: Ferrite Formula

2000-09-22 Thread Jeff Chambers
eron' ; Tony J. O'Hara ; Paolo Roncone Cc: EMC-PSTC List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org Date: 21 September 2000 18:14 Subject: Re: Component Qualification > >Chris & other, >Thanks for the reply. > >Chris has given a great alternate method. I would like further a

Re: Component Qualification: Ferrite Formula

2000-09-22 Thread Jeff Chambers
eron' ; Tony J. O'Hara ; Paolo Roncone Cc: EMC-PSTC List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org Date: 21 September 2000 18:14 Subject: Re: Component Qualification > >Chris & other, >Thanks for the reply. > >Chris has given a great alternate method. I would like further a

Re: Component Qualification

2000-09-21 Thread Koh Nai Ghee
7;t reflect the opinions of my > employer. (Why would they need me if I thought the same way they do?) > > Have a great day! > > Chris Maxwell, Design Engineer > GN Nettest Optical Division > 6 Rhoads Drive, Building 4 > Utica, NY 13502 > PH: 315-797-4449 > FAX: 315-

Re: Component Qualification

2000-09-21 Thread Ralph Cameron
They allowed us the slack, but it > is our responsibility to use it with common sense. > > These are my two cents worth and definitely don't reflect the opinions of my > employer. (Why would they need me if I thought the same way they do?) > > Have a great day! > &g

RE: Component Qualification

2000-09-21 Thread Maxwell, Chris
hr...@gnlp.com > -Original Message- > From: Ralph Cameron [SMTP:ral...@igs.net] > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 11:16 PM > To: Tony J. O'Hara; Koh Nai Ghee > Cc: EMC-PSTC > Subject: Re: Component Qualification > > > Tony: > > I have sold the

Re: Component Qualification

2000-09-21 Thread Ralph Cameron
;Tony J. O'Hara" To: "Koh Nai Ghee" Cc: "EMC-PSTC" Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 4:42 PM Subject: Re: Component Qualification > > You may want to look at using a PCB Electromagnetic Scanning System! One > of the advertised uses for these test device

Re: Component Qualification

2000-09-20 Thread Tony J. O'Hara
You may want to look at using a PCB Electromagnetic Scanning System! One of the advertised uses for these test devices is for quickly comparing EMC performance when component changes are made etc.! I believe there are 4 different manufacturers who make these devices. The one that I'm just startin

R: Component Qualification

2000-09-20 Thread Paolo Roncone
ce for ferrites or higher resonance frequency for capacitors) I go on to step 2. 2. Test Just my opinion... Hope this helps. Paolo -Messaggio originale- Da: Koh Nai Ghee [SMTP:koh...@cyberway.com.sg] Inviato:martedì 19 settembre 2000 22.48 A: EMC-PSTC Oggetto:C

Component Qualification

2000-09-19 Thread Koh Nai Ghee
Group, Can anyone advice on any guide for checking/qualifying second source component, such as crystal, oscillator & ferrite bead, mounted on product is still meeting the emission limits? We are manufacturer of pheripherals cards. Some card has crystal and/or oscillator for digital circuitry. Fer