At a previous employer we had this discussion with a vendor of ours. We
contacted several compotent bodies (30+) in the United Kingdom and other
countries in the European Communittee. We came up with a full 66% that would
test products to CISPR 22 at ten meters. The other 33% would allow products
...@ieee.org; robert.m...@engineers.com
Subject: Re: Distance of Measurements
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Friday, June 20, 1997 9:58PM
???: Matejic, Mirko mmate...@foxboro.com
Reference and therefore preferred test distance for measurements
to CISPR 22 is 10 meters for both classes
Corporation.
--
From: Eric Lifsey
To: emc-pstc; treg
Subject: Distance of Measurements, 55011
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Monday, June 16, 1997 9:36AM
Shall I muddy the issue further...let me address an interesting
section of EN 55011:1991.
But first
.
--
From: Martin Garwood
To: DouglasScott
Cc: emc-pstc
Subject: Re: Distance of Measurements
Date: Friday, June 13, 1997 11:32AM
As Scott correctly quoted from EN55022 (and CISPR 22 1993 edition), If
the field strength measurement at 10 m cannot be made because of high
ambient noise
(9 kHz to GHz) speaks
to the issue of high ambients and moving to a shorter distance to
take measurements. However, the wording (IMO) indicates that the 20*
Log(D/d) correction is not allowed. Let me quote:
Note - Due to the unpredictability of the relationship between
and significantly
sooner publish Annex to EN 55011.
Mirko Matejic
Member of CISPR SC B
--
From: eric.lif...@natinst.com
To: emc-p...@ieee.org; t...@world.std.com
Subject: Distance of Measurements, 55011
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Monday, June 16, 1997 10:36AM
Shall I muddy the issue
At 10:36 AM 6/12/97 -0700, Randy Flanders wrote:
Richard and Robert:
I agree with Richard, although I would recommend the opposite. I would Test
at 10 meters, and bring the antenna in to 3 meters if I come across
frequencies where ambients are interfering. This provides most data at the
To all,
I am curious as to the impact of this version of the standard to the use
3 meter semi-anechoic chambers.
Regards.
--
From: Martin Garwood
To: DouglasScott
Cc: emc-pstc
Subject: Re: Distance of Measurements
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Friday, June 13, 1997 11:32AM
For measuring emissions per CISPR 22B what is the proper distance for
the placement of the antenna?
Is it 3m? or 10m?
[I'm running across reputable labs that claim there is nothing wrong
with measuring everything at 3m, just like FCC B.]
- Robert -
Robert,
Reference and therefore preferred test distance for measurements
to CISPR 22 is 10 meters for both classes A and B.
Measurements at closer distances, including 3 meters are acceptable.
In a case of dispute results from 10 meters will take precedence.
Mirko Matejic
Coauthor of CISPR 22
Robert,
According to BS EN 55022 : 1995 cl. 11.2.1 Antenna-to-EUT distance I quote:
Measurements of the radiated field shall be made with the antenna located at
the horizontal distance from the boudary of the EUT as specified in clause 6.
The boundary of the EUT is defined by an imaginary
CISPR22 measurement distance is 10m. Section 11.2.1 of the standard does
allow for a test distance of less than 10m under certain conditions (e.g.
high ambient noise levels). Any measurements made at a distance other
than 10m should be corrected by 20log(10/d) (where d is the measurement
Robert, as far as I know, 10M is the proper distance for CISPR B
measurements.
Steve Chin
StreamLogic Corp.
Menlo Park, CA, USA
sc...@streamlogic.com
Robert Macy (robert.m...@engineers.com) wrote:
For measuring emissions per CISPR 22B what is the proper distance for
the placement of the
13 matches
Mail list logo
