Hello all,
Tony Fredriksson wrote on 31 Jan 97:
OK, here's another interesting tidbit. I have been informed directly by
an SMA representative of the following concerning ITE equipment that
does not need telecom approvals:
1. If you do not have a distributor, importer, or office in Australia,
is
not currently represented by this mark.
Note - this research was done circa September 1996.
Good Luck,
Eric Lifsey
National Instruments, USA
___
Subject: Re: FW- Australia EMC test
From:Steve Chin sc
--
From: Flinders, Randall
To: EMFLDS-L Mailing List
Subject: Australia EMC test requirements
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Tuesday, January 28, 1997 3:11PM
Hello group,
I am hoping someone may have some information for me on this issue. After
reviewing the Australia
r_flind...@emulex.com wrote:
--
From: Flinders, Randall
To: EMFLDS-L Mailing List
Subject: Australia EMC test requirements
Date: Tuesday, January 28, 1997 3:11PM
Hello group,
I am hoping someone may have some information for me on this issue. After
reviewing the Australia
Randall,
I was under the impression that the statement of compliance/Declaration Of
Conformity for Australia had to be held and signed by a Registered
Australian Company. This would mean that if you were not registered as an
Australian company your importer would do this for you. They would be
To: r_flind...@emulex.com, emc-p...@ieee.org
From: Mark Briggs mrbri...@ix.netcom.com
Subject: Re: FW: Australia EMC test requirements
Sender: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Mark Briggs mrbri...@ix.netcom.com
X-Resent-To: Multiple Recipients emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
X
Austel require a NATA or NATA MRA partner report from an Austel listed
test house, for compliance against AS/NZS3548 (CISPR22). The EMC
Framework as set down by the SMA, which will take over from Austel when
Austel merge with the SMA in July this year (to be known as the ACA,
Australian
7 matches
Mail list logo
