Re: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?

2003-01-14 Thread Ken Javor
D. Heiman, Northeastern University, 3/1/02 Ken Javor >From: "Michael Mertinooke" >To: "Ken Javor" >Subject: RE: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ? >Date: Mon, Jan 13, 2003, 9:08 AM > > > Check out the Kerr Effect (aka "the quadratic electro

RE: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?

2003-01-13 Thread drcuthbert
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk] Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 5:33 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Re: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ? I read in !emc-pstc that drcuthbert wrote (in ) about 'Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998

RE: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?

2003-01-13 Thread drcuthbert
charge is required- not just velocity- to create the time-varying magnetic field from which EM radiation springs. Dave Cuthbert Micron Technology From: Peter L. Tarver [mailto:peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:53 PM To: PSTC Subject: RE: Fiber optic cable testing pe

RE: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?

2003-01-13 Thread Peter L. Tarver
John - It has been known for some time that when optical fiber is bent, it leaks a little. In the OCT2002 issue of Test & Measurement World, a "live fiber detector" is discussed as a part of a test setup: http://www.e-insite.net/tmworld/index.asp?layout=article&art icleid=CA246179 The detecto

Re: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?

2003-01-12 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Gary McInturff wrote (in <917063bab0ddb043af5faa73c7a835d401de2...@windlord.wwp.C OM>) about 'Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?' on Sun, 12 Jan 2003: >Its during the immunity portion that is under question, and throwing a fiber >

RE: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?

2003-01-12 Thread Gary McInturff
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk] Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 5:31 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Re: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ? I read in !emc-pstc that Juhasz, John (IndSys, GE Interlogix) wrote (in <4606624A2A8ABE41AFBA5F8306F2ECB203611

Re: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?

2003-01-11 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Juhasz, John (IndSys, GE Interlogix) wrote (in <4606624A2A8ABE41AFBA5F8306F2ECB203611C@F TWMLVEM01.e2k.ad.ge.com>) about 'Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?' on Fri, 10 Jan 2003: >Is there anyone subscribed to this forum who is on >the

Re: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?

2003-01-11 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that drcuthbert wrote (in ) about 'Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?' on Fri, 10 Jan 2003: > >Chris, >some excellent points! My take on this is that a fiber optical cable has a >cutoff frequency that is way above the "RF" freque

Re: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?

2003-01-11 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Chris Maxwell wrote (in <83d652574e7af740873674f9fc12dbaaf7e...@utexh1w2.gnnettest.com>) about 'Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?' on Fri, 10 Jan 2003: >So where is the "crossover point"? Does it have to do with skin depth? May

RE: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?

2003-01-10 Thread Gary McInturff
understanding. Over to you Don Gary From: Dorin [mailto:dorin.op...@alcatel.com] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 12:49 PM To: don_borow...@selinc.com Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Re: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ? I enjoy it so please go ahead ... How

Re: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?

2003-01-10 Thread Ken Javor
I had forgotten the terminology, and what Mr. Tarver related about the classes is true, but it is not true that electric or magnetic fields should theoretically be able to interact with a stream of photons. >From: "Peter L. Tarver" >To: "PSTC" >Subject: RE: Fib

RE: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?

2003-01-10 Thread Chris Maxwell
Original Message- > From: Juhasz, John (IndSys, GE Interlogix) [SMTP:john.juh...@ge.com] > Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:07 PM > To: drcuthbert; Chris Maxwell; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org > Subject: RE: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ? > > > While there

RE: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?

2003-01-10 Thread Peter L. Tarver
You're partially correct, Ken. However, the photon (in quantum mechanics) is the particle that mediates the electromagnetic force; photon also the name given to the particle that is a quantum of electromagnetic energy. Thus, photons are involved as the particle analog to an electromagnetic wave.

Re: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?

2003-01-10 Thread Dorin
AM > --- > > Don Borowski > 01/10/2003 10:35 AM > > To:"Chris Maxwell" > cc: > Subject: RE: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ? (Document >link: Database 'Don Borowski', View '($Sent)') > &

RE: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?

2003-01-10 Thread Juhasz, John (IndSys, GE Interlogix)
;; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ? Chris, some excellent points! My take on this is that a fiber optical cable has a cutoff frequency that is way above the "RF" frequencies we are concerned with. It just won't act as a waveguide

RE: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?

2003-01-10 Thread don_borow...@selinc.com
-- Forwarded by Don Borowski/SEL on 01/10/2003 10:37 AM Don Borowski 01/10/2003 10:35 AM To:"Chris Maxwell" cc: Subject: RE: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ? (Document link: Database 'Don Borowski', View '($Sent)&#

Re: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?

2003-01-10 Thread Ken Javor
example, you can use either an electric or magnetic field to deflect and point an electron beam, but you cannot do so with a beam of light. >From: "Chris Maxwell" >To: >Subject: RE: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ? >Date: Fri, Jan 10, 2003, 9:23 AM > &

RE: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?

2003-01-10 Thread drcuthbert
y, January 10, 2003 8:24 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ? OK, Enough of this regulatory blah, blah, blah...(although that's what we get paid for). How about a hypothetical question... Typical radiated emissions measure a time var

RE: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?

2003-01-10 Thread Chris Maxwell
OK, Enough of this regulatory blah, blah, blah...(although that's what we get paid for). How about a hypothetical question... Typical radiated emissions measure a time varying electric field produced by the acceleration of electrons. When electrons accelerate back and forth at a given frequenc

Re: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?

2003-01-10 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Hans Mellberg wrote (in <20030110005915.73808.qm...@web40903.mail.yahoo.com>) about 'Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?' on Thu, 9 Jan 2003: >As a matter of fact the local SCV EMC society paper next week is about EM >radiation >from f

RE: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?

2003-01-09 Thread Price, Ed
>-Original Message- >From: Hans Mellberg [mailto:emcconsult...@yahoo.com] >Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:59 PM >To: John Woodgate; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org >Subject: Re: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ? > > > >As a matter of fact the local

Re: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?

2003-01-09 Thread Hans Mellberg
ohn Woodgate wrote: > > I read in !emc-pstc that Tom Cokenias wrote (in > ) about 'Fiber optic cable testing > per EN 55022:1998 ?' on Thu, 9 Jan 2003: > > >I'm wondering how to handle fiber optic cables under the new EN55022 > >going into effect Augus

RE: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?

2003-01-09 Thread Gary McInturff
rough the cable. Gary From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:28 PM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Re: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ? I read in !emc-pstc that Tom Cokenias wrote (in ) about 'Fiber optic cable t

Re: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?

2003-01-09 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Tom Cokenias wrote (in ) about 'Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?' on Thu, 9 Jan 2003: >I'm wondering how to handle fiber optic cables under the new EN55022 >going into effect August 2003. Measurements are supposed to be made >on t

Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?

2003-01-09 Thread Tom Cokenias
Hi, I'm wondering how to handle fiber optic cables under the new EN55022 going into effect August 2003. Measurements are supposed to be made on telecommunications cables, and fiber optic cables are being used for telecommunications. From my reading of the standard I don't see that they wo